Jump to content

Gothamite

Members
  • Posts

    36,227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    277

Posts posted by Gothamite

  1. Come on, Glendale...please, please just pay the money. I want them out here still. It's a decent team we have here, and it'd just be another blow to our civic pride.

    I think "we close libraries and swimming pools to subsidize a failing sports team" is a blow to civic pride. Or it should be. I don't know. All those teabaggers in the desert really cherry-pick which socialism they like and which socialism they don't like.

    Sad but true. But are these particular politicians teabagger darlings? I honestly don't know the political scene in Glendale, beyond the car-crash aspects.

  2. retro_suns_190.jpg

    I never noticed that before, but now whenever I see this logo, it is all I am going to be able to think about.

    They had a reversible-version of the wordmark on all their home jerseys until relatively recently.

    michael-jordan-of-the-chicago-bulls-and-charles-barkley-of-phoenix-suns-in-nba-finals-game-6-in-chicago-1993.jpg

    I really miss that. The current vertically-arched wordmark just doesn't have the same zip.

    They still use it on their "not-really-our-primary-logo" primary logo:

    g9agfgof0kzui4u445wrsj3e5.gif

    But that's not the same thing.

  3. I personally think Milwaukee could be a good home for an NHL team, miles better than some of the ridiculous locations thrown around for the past 3 years :coughcough: Kansas City and Las Vegas.

    I also think Seattle would jump at the chance of having the Bucks over a new expansion/relocated NHL team. The Bucks most probably have to be out of Milwaukee, way before anyone can realistically think of Milwaukee as a potential NHL home.

    But for speculation purposes I would say Milwaukee is definitely a good home for a team.

    I agree with all of this.

    If the Bucks go away, then the city could be considered for hockey. But not until then.

  4. Question for Gothamite: with the renaissance of Brooklyn, is suburban Long Island, in some sense, dying? All I read is that the high taxes and NIMBYism/BANANAism are sending everyone out of there. I mean, it's not that people won't live there anymore, just that maybe there won't be that sort of enormous middle class that would justify building a 17,000-seat arena outside of New York City.

    The city is more and more attractive, but I'm not sure that I would categorize LI as dying in any sense.

    The Long Island Rail Road is expanding, making Nassau an even better location for suburban commuters. That will help secure that middle class. I think the tax thing is a bit overblown - we keep hearing the same thing about the city, with our added income tax, but that hasn't stopped people from flocking to Gotham.

    And I also think that Brooklyn's main growth has come in the more urban areas rather than the more suburban ones on the eastern edge of the borough, and is therefore largely irrelevant to Long Island's situation. I don't think Fort Greene is attracting the sort of people who would otherwise live in Hicksville.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.