chipper12 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 So yet again im here for your opinions and help what are the views on this logo update ? Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipper12 Posted February 24, 2016 Author Share Posted February 24, 2016 bump Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PascalHugo Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 The idea is good but there are some things that can be improved . The small bottom triskell is repetitive. There is too little space between EAG and the edge. And last thing , the foundation year should be put higher up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdp Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 8 hours ago, PascalHugo said: The idea is good but there are some things that can be improved . The small bottom triskell is repetitive. There is too little space between EAG and the edge. And last thing , the foundation year should be put higher up. Overall, the various elements of the new badge are kind of cramped. I agree with PascalHugo's assessments. Only thing I would mention is to make the top triskele smaller, too; give it some breathing room. May want to try a thicker border around the entire badge. "Type something, will ya? We're paying for this stuff." - Peter VenkmanComplete: Stateside Soccer Federation | Complete: World Football Club Alliance | Stalled: Roller Hockey International Redux | Stalled: MLB & Soccer Crossover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncoboy7 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 I agree with PascalHugo that the spacing of EAG is a little off. Fix the spacing there and also that white symbol below the year should probably be somwhere else. It's misplaced there IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipper12 Posted February 25, 2016 Author Share Posted February 25, 2016 Update 1 . Just a bit of fine tuning. Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PascalHugo Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Much better. Like said Jdp reduce the site of the triskell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncoboy7 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Bump the G a few spaces to the right and bump the E a few spaces to the left and you have yourself a solid logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipper12 Posted February 25, 2016 Author Share Posted February 25, 2016 Update 2. Spacing eag and smaller top graphic. Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchie Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 the weight of the 3 letters seems different to me. @Frenchie_TO Owner of the Rochester Americans of the MLH Owner of the Toronto Frenchies of the GCFHL6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg_Fryman Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 A thick white outline would tie it all together and like stated above the 3 letters are different weights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncoboy7 Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 2 hours ago, Frenchie said: the weight of the 3 letters seems different to me. Gonna have to agree with this. It seems like that the G has a heavier weight than the E or A. Better with the spacing, but only this time, scoot the E over just maybe 4 more clicks to the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipper12 Posted February 26, 2016 Author Share Posted February 26, 2016 Update 3, White outline and font refinement. Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncoboy7 Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Perfect! Looks great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchie Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 3 hours ago, chipper12 said: Update 3, White outline and font refinement. Weight is better, but what font is it? Looks like it's a different one now. @Frenchie_TO Owner of the Rochester Americans of the MLH Owner of the Toronto Frenchies of the GCFHL6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncoboy7 Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 23 minutes ago, Frenchie said: Weight is better, but what font is it? Looks like it's a different one now. It's the same font, it just looks different with the weight change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchie Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, Broncoboy7 said: It's the same font, it just looks different with the weight change. is it antialiased? Because the angles on the G look much smoother on the update (almost round). @Frenchie_TO Owner of the Rochester Americans of the MLH Owner of the Toronto Frenchies of the GCFHL6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipper12 Posted February 26, 2016 Author Share Posted February 26, 2016 It's just the font on the original logo. The G has been same just must be the way inkscape is rendering it when I convert to PNG. Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.