lordholmes Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 Something that has really bugged me this year is a mistake with the Panther's pants. The Panther head logo is missing from the pants.I've only noticed it this year, and imagine it is just a slip up by the equipment manager. I could understand this type of slip up on a thrid string QB, but it has shown up on DeShaun Foster and Mike Wahle. Wahle is the starting LG and Foster looks to be the starter at RB this week.So is this just a mistake with the equpiment manager or could the supplier (Reebok) be to blame? Either way I feel it looks really crappy and needs to be fixed. For example see this link:Charlotte.com Picture The picture shows Jordan Carstens #67 starting RDT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boardname Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 This was brought up a few weeks ago. But that time was funnier because the picture from the official Panthers page was Photoshopped specifically to ADD the logos to the missing players. The shot was of the 5 linemen and 2 of them were missing the logo, as shown by the original unPhotoshopped picture we found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordholmes Posted November 30, 2005 Author Share Posted November 30, 2005 This was brought up a few weeks ago. But that time was funnier because the picture from the official Panthers page was Photoshopped specifically to ADD the logos to the missing players. The shot was of the 5 linemen and 2 of them were missing the logo, as shown by the original unPhotoshopped picture we found. Ah I see, lol. Well this can be sent to the graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Danimal Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 I've noticed this, too. It almost seems that about 20% of the team is missing the logo on the pants.I actually think the pants look better without it but agree that it needs to be consistant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Apollo Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 Oh it's all so sordid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powersurge Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 do they ever use any secondary logos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intimidator85 Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 I never noticed. Really, it's a minute detail. You really have to be focusing in on the player's uniform to notice something like that. I just prefer to watch players play football rather than see if a small logo is at the hip of their pants. If there are any large uniform inconsistencies, then I'll have words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElwoodCuse Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 The Pirates had a similar problem this year. Apparently while Majestic makes the vest part of their jersey, there is no specific black undershirt so players can wear Nike, Under Armour, or whatever. Some players didn't have the Pirate logo sewn on to their undershirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaftDu Posted November 30, 2005 Share Posted November 30, 2005 I never noticed. Really, it's a minute detail. You really have to be focusing in on the player's uniform to notice something like that. I just prefer to watch players play football rather than see if a small logo is at the hip of their pants. If there are any large uniform inconsistencies, then I'll have words. haha, this is a forum for us uniform watchers. I think it is interesting that the whole Panther team can get away with this. Yet Portis would get fine for not having socks like everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.