brinkeguthrie Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/more...e.ap/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 So does this mean that Rbk will cease to be or will it be like Converse being bought by Nike, they just revamp it, or will they just leave it be and combine their financial gain? Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 So does this mean that the NFL will have the Adidas logos on th unis, or will it reamin Reebok?Or was that uneffected? On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brinkeguthrie Posted January 26, 2006 Author Share Posted January 26, 2006 i think they're being run as separate divisions, and RBKs league deals stay as they are. Tho I wonder if you'll be now able to wear Adidas in the NFL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcgd Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Stays the same pretty much, nothing is happening to the reebok brand or anything from what I've heard.In the article they talked about Reebok perhaps going for the "style" end of things with their Classics line and such, while adidas goes after the performance end of shoes. I always prefered adidas over any other shoe in terms of comfort, especially with spikes and cleats. I would say that most people won't even notice the takeover in terms of logos on uniforms or anything. You will see an agressive marketing campaign from adidabok and nike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.