jeh-see Posted February 28, 2004 Share Posted February 28, 2004 This is a concept I decided to put together. Let me know what you think (I lost some quality putting together on a website, since tripod only accepts images in JPG or GIF format, but I do have vector images of each of these if anyone wants to see them via email or what have you)Bullsharks Logos, Wordmarks and Uniforms (copy and paste....i think)Feedback and critique welcome.Thanks~UJBTW-Team colors...Midnight Green, Siesmic Silver, Bay Blue and White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 28, 2004 Share Posted February 28, 2004 I like the alternate logo, but the whole concept is a bit rough the wordmarks are kinda haggad and does not look right, and I cant tell whast going on with the jerseys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sterling84 Posted February 28, 2004 Share Posted February 28, 2004 This may seem a little harsh, because I am drunk. But I mean no offense. I aim to give you some constructive criticism to help with this concept.First. LOVE the name. Bull Sharks are some vicous bastards.OK, umm, graphic degredation withstanding, the gills do not curve with the contour of the body.The tail is too big, only making it smaller will convey the perspective and size of the animal.The triangle is a tired and lame shape to "contain" your logo. Let the drawing speak for itself.THis is a helluva start. I like it a lot. Hope this helps. I'll log on tomorrow and confirm/deny my post and apologize for my inibriated rant. Please excuse, one of my best friends found out he was going to be a dad today. CEL.........UH.......BRATE Good times............Uh huh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeh-see Posted February 29, 2004 Author Share Posted February 29, 2004 Thanks for the critiques and advice guys!!!!!! Sterling, I took your advice on the main logo, as well as upgraded the picture quality on the site best i could. Here are the results....Updated and upgraded!!!!!!!!~UJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zer0dotcom Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 These are pretty sharp. the uniforms are really small tho, its difficult to make out many details...from what I can see, it's confusing to tell which is which. The dark/home has too much white, and the roa/white has too much dark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCScout76 Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Well done - color scheme is good, a bit light, but good logos. I think you could find a better font, good use of the color, something about it isn't right, IMO.Good job on it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Bear with me, I'm addressing a few negatives first, then come the positives.The thing that gets me is the fact that the primary and secondary logos are like two primary logos for different teams called the Sharks. Some may interpret this as a good thing, but I think a good secondary logo isn't a good primary logo necessarily. I think a good secondary logo emphasizes some aspect of the team (like initials, or in the case of a team named the sharks, the dorsal fin or some other notable feature), while a good primary logo tries to encompass all aspects of the team.Speaking to the technical art side of things, I'd like to see more consistency of line weight in the primary logo.On the positive side, I think you have some excellent concepts here. I like both primary logos individually. The wordmark has a few too many outlines (or in the case of the "Hampton Roads" text, outlines that overpower the text and make it less readable), but the font is cool and original. The colour use on the uniforms is well done (although I'd have to see that jersey cut in action to pass judgment on those).All in all, you've put a lot of effort into this concept, UniformJipetto, and it shows. You have some work here that is definitely worth being proud of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 My only real problem are the wordmarks. I think they could be cleaner and less jagged. Otherwise, great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeh-see Posted March 1, 2004 Author Share Posted March 1, 2004 THANKS GUYS!!!!! All the criticism is great and helpful. I agree with Sy and the others about the wordmark looking kinda "cramped," I though so when I made it. I'll clean that up and see what I can do as far as the rest of your suggestions (because that is what matters most to me since I am DESPERATELY tring to expand my Illustrator skills).Keep the feedback coming and again, thanks for everything so far!!!!~UJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puckcool22 Posted March 1, 2004 Share Posted March 1, 2004 nice minor leagueish identity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted March 1, 2004 Share Posted March 1, 2004 They are not bad, but I agree with StL the wordmark is not very good, you shoudl find a better font. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.5a90bda18d1423f9b5b6bf16d1e9e0a7.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.