Jump to content

Concept Media Guide Design


joedesigns

Recommended Posts

Not the right Falcons logo, though. That style Falcons logo has never existed as a mark for the Falcons. The back of the wing swoop is a straight curve...does not include jagged details

I'll give the falcons a call and see if they can provide me with the right one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks awesome even if that isn't their logo it look better then the real one

Really????

My argument would be that the aesthetic difference between the real Falcons logo and the fake one, which has circulated since the redesign in 2003, is insignificant an doesn't offer any logical improvement worthy of that claim. What makes it look "better" than the real one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks awesome even if that isn't their logo it look better then the real one

Really????

My argument would be that the aesthetic difference between the real Falcons logo and the fake one, which has circulated since the redesign in 2003, is insignificant an doesn't offer any logical improvement worthy of that claim. What makes it look "better" than the real one?

I just personally it looks better with the thinner stroke following the actual wing edge then the fatter swooping stroke. Just my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks awesome even if that isn't their logo it look better then the real one

Really????

My argument would be that the aesthetic difference between the real Falcons logo and the fake one, which has circulated since the redesign in 2003, is insignificant an doesn't offer any logical improvement worthy of that claim. What makes it look "better" than the real one?

I just personally it looks better with the thinner stroke following the actual wing edge then the fatter swooping stroke. Just my opinion

Kinda makes it look like the Falcon's wing has fingers. Also, the helmet at the bottom seems a little redundant. There are already three helmets on the image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks awesome even if that isn't their logo it look better then the real one

Really????

My argument would be that the aesthetic difference between the real Falcons logo and the fake one, which has circulated since the redesign in 2003, is insignificant an doesn't offer any logical improvement worthy of that claim. What makes it look "better" than the real one?

I just personally it looks better with the thinner stroke following the actual wing edge then the fatter swooping stroke. Just my opinion

Kinda makes it look like the Falcon's wing has fingers. Also, the helmet at the bottom seems a little redundant. There are already three helmets on the image

I agree with this- also, since the three helmets in the image have the actual logo, the helmet on the bottom (which has a fake logo) seems out of place.

Your execution of the design is very good, particularly if you make the renders and the HDR-esque images yourself.

Keep posting concepts. I'd just suggest using the actual logo, unless you are attempting a presentation of a new logo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The photoshop work is absolutely top notch. The typography on the other hand brings it down just a bit. Try giving the type more, dare I say, "flare". Experiment with different type treatments and this thing becomes GOLD!

My text does indeed suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You went outside the normal frame of concepts here by designing a media guide cover, which I like very much. The exceution of the idea is also well done. A+

FsQiF2W.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.