29texan

The more I see these, the more I think these:

Read the whole thing . . .

"Nice" is subjective. This was in 1996, btw:

"Ice"

Disagree.

I started this thread back in 2013. The Texans were the first on the list... and I stand by it. Downgrade.

Exactly. Honestly, the jerseys were the best part of the change.

To balance things out, of course.

The socks should be the least of their worries.

Thoughts: Helmet - D | The Seahawks helmet stripe doesn't work here. Jerseys - A- | I like the mountain sleeve motif. But the random triangles on the side? Why? Pants - C- | The stripe, again, is kinda knocking it down. Overall: C+

Honestly, I gotta give them credit. They managed to make that look somewhat "timeless". I may miss this... but that depends on what happens within the next 30 mins.

The Gradient helmet is just an alternate. If they HAD to do gradients, it should have just been for the helmet and not full time. +

The Cowboys don't need to be "modernized"... just fixed. ONE Blue. ONE Silver. ONE cohesive design between the two. Just be as consistent in the uniforms as you are with disappointing the fanbase every season.

I think the Niners and Colts look better with their color facemasks... but those could go either way, to be fair.

Just sayin'...

NO! Gray facemasks should only be reserved for throwbacks and teams with silver helmets.

I've said the Texans were one of the few teams that got their look right the FIRST time... and I stand by that.

Yeah, TCU is kind of "loose" with some of its branding...

What took so long...?

Hmm...

Yeah, that's an accurate discription.

They could have gone with a better font... but it's an improvement for sure.

I appreciate that they're actually trying again... and I don't mind the template idea. It's just still so poorly executed. The last three logos have been better, but "better" in the same way that a low-scoring, championship game with no offense is better than a blowout in a championship game, where one team doesn't show up.

Updating it, based on current rumors and what the NFL would do... MLB with 32 (*Montréal & Nashville expansion / Astros and Padres switch Leagues / **A's move) American: North - Chicago - Cleveland - Detroit - Minnesota East - Baltimore - Boston - New York - Toronto South - Kansas City - *Nashville - Tampa Bay - Texas West - L.A. - **Las Vegas - San Diego - Seattle ------------------------------------------ National: North - Chicago - Cincinnati - Milwaukee - Pittsburgh East - *Montréal - New York - Philadelphia - Washington South - Atlanta - Houston - Miami - St. Louis West - Arizona - Colorado - L.A. - San Francisco And since they all play each other, now, I'd think there'd be "Protected Rivals", so that you'd still see Cubs/Cardinals, Rangers/Astros, etc.