Jump to content

infrared41

Moderators
  • Posts

    27,492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    95

Everything posted by infrared41

  1. How many Matthew Stafford posts will it take to make this happen? Asking for...who am I kidding? I'm asking for me because I think it would be funny.
  2. if Kurt Warner is in the HOF, there is no good argument against Stafford being in the HOF. Stafford has had the better career and it's not even close.
  3. If the DCEU wants to do a good Catwoman movie, she could totally return to the part. Or...she could come home to Ohio and spend the summer riding around on my bike with me.
  4. Halle Berry set the record for being the hottest 56 year old ever.
  5. Less than 10%. Same here. The Halle Berry bit was cool and good Lord is she still gorgeous.
  6. Using my "if I know his name he's probably a hall of famer" metric for offensive lineman, I guess I'm OK with Boselli. Branch was a top wide receiver in an era when 73 receptions by a RB once led the league (Chuck Foreman 1975.) Branch was a pretty big deal when I was a kid. If you compare him to WRs today, there's no way he's a Hall of Famer. If you compare him to the WRs of his era, I think he should have been in long before now. If Leroy Butler had a HOF career, why did it take the voters 15 years to figure it out? Butler was good, but no one is confusing him with Ronnie Lott or Ed Reed. McNally? I'm guessing "he -ed the fewest teams by making bad calls" is the metric for officials. Sam Mills is the LB version of Leroy Butler - it sure took them long enough to figure out he's a Hall of Famer. You can make an argument for Richard Seymour - which is the problem. Seems to me that if a player is HOF worthy, there would be no argument. Dick Vermeil? Seriously? Yeah he won a Super Bowl with the Rams and made another with the Eagles. You know who has almost twice as many wins as Dick Vermeil? Marty Schottenheimer. (204 to 124) Super Bowl wins are weighted way too heavily into the HOF equation. Vermeil is a perfect example of that. It only took the voters nine years to decide Bryant Young had a Hall of Fame career. I guess that's better than 15 years.
  7. Upsetting the stoolies should have gotten her a raise and a promotion.
  8. @LMU Any chance we can add a "whatever" reaction? It sure would come in handy.
  9. Other than KC and Buffalo, I can't think of a team who wouldn't love to have Burrow. Maybe the Chargers, but they'd still give it some serious thought.
  10. I second this and because I agree with him, I will merely puke on DG's original post and reserve a hate for something more appropriate.
  11. OK, it's time to make this new system work to our advantage. I'm proposing we start forming alliances. If you're in the alliance, you agree to like or love every post from each member of the alliance. Members of your alliance will compose a list of people whose posts we will hate or puke on no matter that they say.
  12. Just to be random, I'm currently hating every third post that I read. Sorry (well, not really) if anyone gets caught in the crossfire.
  13. Rooting against the Bengals in this Super Bowl is like rooting against kittens. The choice in this one is easy.
  14. It took @IceCap all of a couple hours to completely blow away two years of Nike's research, study groups, and circle jerks.
  15. That would almost make sense if the Comrades were in a market where college football is a big deal, but they're not. The only "big time" college football teams reasonably within the market are Virginia, VT, and Maryland and calling Virginia and Maryland "big time" programs is really stretching it. If chasing college football fans was part of his reasoning, Mr. Danny is even dumber than we're giving him credit for and that's really saying something. There are a lot of markets where chasing college football fans might be worth a shot and DC isn't any of them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.