Silver_Star

I did not say that either. I am just saying using a Ram's head is as generic as how the Ravens had to ditch the shield due to legal reasons and couldn't make anything interest that could include another shield with the bird using some Old English stuff? But looking at the Rams, the horns on the helmet is very unique and is a mainstay since 1948.

No, with the Rams, keep the horns. If the Rams gotten a logo, it would not fare well with fans as they are used to the horns on the helmets. I find the horns on the helmet to be awesome. I like it. Downsizing the Rams helmet where they are just like every NFL team is just not unique. The Rams and Bengals have a unique helmet and not to be touched because it is creative for 1948 and 1981 respectfully.

I like that better. The C with the helmet stripe. How about the solid colors with stripes from the B logo would look like.

Well, good. Now they need to actually make the orange pants be a mainstay as well as the white helmets with the 1946's uniforms since they wore white helmets from 1946-1950.

I guess I am more partial to white numbers with whatever secondary color trim on very dark uniforms (i.e burgundy, navy blue, maroon, black, pewter (god forbid), and slate grey).

Yes, but do you think the medium red (it is darker than the Kansas City Chiefs red they use) would work with navy blue? Because if you make the white trim at least legible similar to the Raiders white throwbacks from their 1970 look where the black trim was slightly thicker to make the silver numbers look in place instead of a thin black trim which would make the silver numbers hard to read.

Ok, but that WFL Portland team has navy blue numbers with white trim on an electric lime jersey and you wasn't sold on that?

But that is indoors. Most NHL and NBA teams can pull that off. Being that some teams have outdoor type stadiums, it couldn't possibly work you can try it out for once.

I understand the red jerseys and red helmets. But red numbers with white trim on navy blue would look bad. I can see it being a black jersey and the red being a little lighter (Kansas City Chief style red), but with the look, I can't see the navy blue jerseys having red numbers. The red jerseys with Houston blue numbers with white trim would look very beautiful with Houston blue helmets. That would be a very beautiful look for the team.

That will not look great. The color rush was a one-time deal, the new uniforms are better off with white numbers with red, navy, or Houston blue trim.

That god awful 1996-2008 49ers uniforms were gross.

I wish Dallas went back to this look.The royal blue and slight slate silver really looked great from 1965-1980. I really wish they think of returning to this.

Oh, it's fake. What a relief. And as much as I do not like the Browns colors, etc. I wholeheartedly disagree with you. When they went with white facemask in 1975, it really did wonders for the orange pants. Hell, the white facemask worked well with their 1985-1995 look as well. I liked the fact that it flow with the all white, orange helmet look too. I think white facemask look better for them than grey. There is no ounce of grey in their uniforms. I always say that grey facemask looks better with teams like Dallas Cowboys, Las Vegas Raiders, Detroit Lions (varies), Atlanta Falcons, Indianapolis Colts, Philadelphia Eagles, and maybe I am saying this to say this, the Seattle Seahawks (since navy helmets are their thing now).

NOOOOOOOOOOO! I hope this is fake, because if it's not, then I am disgusted!

So basically old gold with a dark green stripe. Ok, that makes sense. I was afraid they would have a reverse helmet which is green with the white/athletic gold/white stripes. I was going to check out on that deal.

OH :censored:! Just leave the Ravens and Packers alone. I know damn well the ones I bold will have lack luster alternate helmets. Imagine, Jaguars go with teal helmets which to me will look horrendous in many aspects if they use the chrome type of shell that the Giants and Rams defaults are as well as the red alt helmet of the Texans. But if they use flat, then that if fine with me. But that is not the case. Vikings only need their 1969-1995 throwbacks or their 1961-1967 throwbacks, not some hideous alt that is probably going to be white in this case the stupidest looking idea they could come up with. Packers should go back to the navy blue and athletic gold throwback but with grey facemask. Their 1940 throwback is in my opinion the better ones ever. My opinion may be unpopular with the Packers throwbacks, but I prefer the 1940 ones better. I am afraid of what they have in plan for the Giants. This scares me a lot!

I would take the red jersey and flip the word and block number colors to white with black trim and eliminate the red pants and use white pants with black and red stripes. Then that would be the best uniforms ever. Is this the color rush by the way? If you eliminate the red pants and use white pants from their throwbacks, then this wouldn't even look bad at all.

I think it's time for them to return to the orange helmets they had from 1962-1966.

You better hope they go the 1968-1996 route because if they do not, then we are stuck with this snowcap stupidity. And why use white helmets when the orange helmets would of done better with the redo? Didn't they wear orange helmets from 1962-1966?

BETTER!!!

Boring, and no flair. Plus the color combo just makes it look even stale than before.

I just looked at it and I saw the stripes. Looks, hmmmmm. I wonder what the red pants stripes look like?

WAIT A MINUTE! THE TEXANS WAS USING MIDNIGHT BLUE SINCE 2002 AND NEVER CHANGED THAT AT ALL. THEY STILL WORE MIDNIGHT BLUE ALL THROUGH 2002-2023!!!! GEEZUS!

Oh dear god! No pants stripe? Oh god! I am done with this crap!