Jump to content

colortv

Members
  • Posts

    1,375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by colortv

  1. What's the difference between having more than one helmet color and more than one jersey color?
  2. Do we have any word on if Washington will unveil a new name this offseason?
  3. Which teams have gone the longest without a major uniform change/rebrand? Excluding "traditional" teams that won't change like Green Bay, Las Vegas, Chicago, Steelers, Chiefs?
  4. Seems like the Oiler's lack of success didn't ingratiate themselves into Houstons DNA like the Browns were in Clevelands. It is quite stunning some of the business decisions the NFL made in the 90's that would be unfathomable today. Putting a team in Jacksonville and dropping two huge markets like LA and Houston. Sort of reflects all of the clown "legacy" owners that wouldn't sniff ownership today.
  5. Isn't that just the point? We don't need ANOTHER blue dominant team.
  6. No, it's not "dead wrong". Your opinion is that it's dead wrong. Just like my opinion is the opposite. Your opinion is not fact.
  7. Bad idea, imo for a number of reasons: 1. We've already got the Chargers and Titans using powder in the AFC. We've already got them plus Patriots, Colts, Bills all using blue as the dominant color. Texans current color scheme stands out more. 2. IMO again, but everything about the Texans brand is far superior to the Oilers. 3. The fanbase has had 20 years to get used to the Texans, there's an entire generation who only knows the Texans. No need to alienate them potentially. 4. You don't want the fanbase to be stuck in the past, you want to establish the TEXANS, not remind everyone that you're NOT the Oilers.
  8. I think they should make red the primary color and blue the secondary to further carve out their own niche/fandom from the Cowboys who are so dominant in Texas. Plus, Chiefs are the only red dominant team in the AFC. Like this concept.
  9. LeBron is at summer league wearing an "LA" logo Lakers colored hat with a "LeBronLand" logo(aka Disneyland logo). Guess where Disneyland is?
  10. Cowboys don't treat Oxnard as home market. For media and sports purposes the Los Angeles market is LA+OC+Riverside+San Bernardino+Ventura counties. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_metropolitan_area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Los_Angeles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Los_Angeles#Combined_Statistical_Area It's common sense and anything else is nitpicking.
  11. Rams and Chargers are both holding training camps within a 20 minute drive of Angel Stadium, with it being promoted as in the home market. But they aren't Los Angeles teams right?
  12. The LA Rams played in Anaheim for 15 years. Angel stadium is 30 miles from downtown LA. The Cowboys play in Arlington, the 49ers in Santa Clara etc. The LA metro extends far past the distance of Angel stadium, and the Dodgers or any LA sports team will tell you any day it's part of "their" market. There's probably at least as many Dodger fans in OC as there are Angel fans. There are financial, logistical, and other substantive issues that come into play for where teams physically play in their metro areas, anything else is just nitpicking when you've got nothing better to do.
  13. That's why I find this Chargers stuff in the other thread so silly. They have a market from the Mexican border in the south to basically Santa Barbara in the North, stretching 230 miles North to South with 20 million people. You would have to try to fail in order to do so.
  14. Angel Stadium is less than 30 miles from downtown LA. I don't think most people realize how big the LA metro area is, as Bill Simmons put it. There are points that are well over 100 miles apart.
  15. Nothing tops this and NBC of the 90's for NBA/NFL. It's amazing how boring and bland ESPN/ABC's coverage is in comparison.
  16. Can anyone explain why the Knicks shade of orange seems to translate across different images with so much variance? This is how it should look IMO: But more often than not it appears lighter and more "washed out". Not singling out your designs in particular just something I've noticed for a long time.
  17. Yes, with some minor modifications as sayahh did. Although it is great to see the inverse version. Thank you. The Cavs courts look breathtaking. Exactly what I was looking for, thank you. I should have just used the Lakers court as a reference for the color layout. I think this layout would improve the Knicks court tremendously, although the inverse version might be even better. Any thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.