DCarp1231

Same with a certain Texas team doing it every year just to constantly hover around 8-8

Not saying this is a probable outcome, but the league might just say “work with Nike to create a separate alternate uniform that your second helmet can only be worn with.”

Jared Goff as a member of the Lions-

Before the helmet rule change, most, if not all, alternate helmets were used for throwbacks, correct? Why would teams really opt for anything but that? Chances are if there is a two-helmet rule, we’d get these, plus a return of most of those above among others-

This hasn’t been post, but this seems to be the patch they’re using next season

In terms of when that picture is from? I want to say 2009 when all the former AFL teams celebrated 50 years since the merger. Now, considering Cleveland wasn’t an AFL team, chances are they wanted to fit in with the crowd.

So for the Browns, one could reasonably assume that we’ll just get these throwbacks, but on the Nike template

Just because the throwbacks are still around doesn’t mean the gold pants are. They’ll probably put stripes back on the helmet before they bring out the gold pants again

There really shouldn’t be a problem with changing his number to 7. All athletes have different reasons for number choices. Some more bogus than others.

Is it though? A reminder on your chest to be even better than you already were is being an a-hole?

Tom Brady was prepared to change his number to 7 if Chris Godwin didn’t want to give up 12

The Eagles have fantastic uniforms. It really is a shame they get overshadowed by the “nEEds tO bE keLLy gReeN” sentiment that gets shoved down our throats. The midnight green they currently use is beautiful in every way. Yes, the newer matte midnight green. Not the shiny (yet somehow dull) midnight green from years prior. However, one thing needs to change. They, much like the Ravens, suffer from a sub-par number font that is in desperate need of a facelift.

I got those a lot in middle school

A couple things- • This still doesn’t fix the Angelos family having the “it’s a privilege to watch Orioles games” mentality they have against streaming services • The biggest problem is the Orioles and Nationals fans who don’t have Xfinity(Comcast), Verizon FiOS, DirecTV, or Dish likely not being able to access the games/content aka those of us who have SlingTV among others • The only way to fix the issue of non-cable/non-satellite users not being able to watch games would be offering a standalone annual subscription fee

They’ll likely never get the opportunity to use those colors, but my favorite concept I’ve seen of those colors being used is this one-

I suppose this falls into the CBS Brand Refresh- CBS All Access is getting rebranded as Paramount+

At least three teams (off the top of my head) have completely unnecessary jersey patches Here’s to hoping at least one of them drop it relatively soon.

Those white helmets should never meet the light of day. We’re at least lucky they never made it out of the initial franchise unveiling press conference.

The Texans uniform are fine, IMO. Could they be better? Absolutely. I’ll always see them as New England’s uniforms that just got perfected. The Patriots uniforms that were unveiled in 2001 were obviously meant to be a test run for what Houston did with their uniforms.

Sports content shifting to USA Network is such a weird flex, but I guess it makes sense since they’ve done it in the past. Mostly under emergency situations. Regional Networks won’t be harmed, but I imagine they’ll go through a soft rebrand of sorts.

This is slightly noteworthy. The Falcons, along with Atlanta United, are retiring the No. 44 for the 2021 season in honor of Hank Aaron who passed away earlier today-

I believe it’s looks to be variant from this concept from one of our own @OhioSportsMan61 with some slight changes

The more I look at this, the more I just don’t like it. Yes, it’s better than the “B”, but it’s still objectively bad itself.