Jump to content

DCarp1231

Members
  • Posts

    9,194
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    129

Everything posted by DCarp1231

  1. The more I look at this, the more I just don’t like it. Yes, it’s better than the “B”, but it’s still objectively bad itself.
  2. There’s no blowhole either. I’m a bit worried he has insufficient breathing capabilities.
  3. Miami Dolphins rebrand that puts an emphasis on grey/silver while mixing old with new Thats the best description I can give. EDIT: added pictures from link
  4. Shoot. Slipped my mind. Thanks for the check.
  5. Which is why I asked if it would be a viable option on the condition the team utilizes logos that mimic the temporary ones they currently used. If Golden State can still use “Warriors” with a bridge logo, why would “Renegades” with an adjusted roundel “W” logo be any different?
  6. I feel as though most people struggled to accept the uniforms because it was a relatively big risk from their previously traditional-esque set from 1981-2003 this- to this- The stripes on the jersey went from contained and streamlined to free-flowing while the pants saw the overall stripe essentially becomes a tiger stripe itself. Including being the first(?) to not reach the bottom of the pant leg. As well as being one of the teams in the Reebok era to include the paneling. In a vacuum, it’s a pretty solid uniform that has held up for 16 seasons.
  7. Oh no... not the BENGALS using TIGER stripes I fail to see the “excessive” amount of striping you claim to see. There’s a tasteful amount of it all around. Now, if they went bonkers with it on top of the shoulders, down the sides of the jerseys, and on the socks, THEN there’d be an issue. FFIW, I do agree with the removal of the side panels and an alteration to the number font.
  8. Not sure if it really means anything or if any other teams have done it, but the Washington team store on NFLShop.com doesn’t have any official Nike Men’s jerseys available for purchase (other than discounted Haskins).
  9. I’ve noticed a lot of people, usually 40+ yrs in age, in the surrounding DC area still use the old name. Most younger fans have accepted the new temporary name. Overall it’s been a pretty decent and easy transition. Obviously there's been resistance, but the vast majority have welcomed the name. As far as a name starting with R? I’d wonder if an identity involving Renegades would be accepted on the condition that it mimics the current temporary logos For the uniforms, I love the current style, but if they want to focus on team tradition and history, I’d suggest do a little bit of merging between past uniforms. The team should consider over the shoulder stripes similar to this- Bring back the helmet stripes and swap the numbers color to white like this- Always have three stripes on the pants. Including a new pair of white pants to match the gold pants. Relegate the burgundy pants to an alternate away option-
  10. I agree with this. However, I’d also add on by saying anything starting with “Red” is as much of a copout as what the current name is. To satisfy the fanbase, I’d argue they need to get as close as possible to the old name as they can. “Warriors” would be the choice for this. The problem is, they need to get as far away from ‘formerly known as’ as possible to not cause any backlash. Bottom line, stay as far away from the old name as possible.
  11. Just came here to post this. I’m watching the 2013 Ravens-Vikings game and never realized (or just forgot) Jared Allen wore this
  12. This vaguely points in all directions to the new name being “Redwolves”
  13. ‘Tis but a pebble in the pond
  14. Weird considering most fans actually seem to really like the new “W” logo with & without the roundel. Also, the stripes wouldn’t even be considered “Football Team Era”. If anything, the stripeless helmet w/ numbers is definitively the “Football Team Era”. They would’ve been better off just removing the old logo and keeping everything else if they didn’t want to stray too far into the “Football Team Era”.
  15. Honestly all of those look great. I’d fully expect stripes to be back on the helmet next season
  16. I wouldn’t call it unnecessary. It fits with the style the team went for. IMO, there’s really nothing bad about the Jets having the black uniform. If I’m going to be completely honest, it’s my favorite of the set and arguably one of the best current alternate uniforms.
  17. The Jets current look is way better than their previous set and should undoubtedly survive beyond the 2023-24 season. I also think they should explore swapping the green and black socks every now and again.
  18. There’s definitely been some times when the ads overtake the reply box, there’s been times when ads force the screen to glitch out, ads overlapping the notification bell icon, ads having a double (x)/secret second ad, the list goes on.
  19. The Panthers strike me as a team whose mother was the Raiders and she had an affair with one of the blue-heavy teams and everyone’s too afraid to ask who the father is
  20. I mean, sure it’s Ray Rice and he has his problems, but I never knew he wore 39 for the Ravens before switching to 27
  21. I’m of the opinion that they should drop the black jersey and black pants. I also think they should use only black socks. Home- T/W/B Away- W/T/B H Alt- T/T/B A Alt- W/W/B Also, someone on Twitter runs a Jaguars Uniform Tracker and somehow, the team managed to use all 9 possible combinations this season
  22. In recent years, I’ve become desensitized to the NBA in regards to wrong team and right team. There’s so much fluctuation in rosters that most players lost the privilege to even have a wrong or right team.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.