Jump to content

GDAWG

Members
  • Posts

    8,056
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GDAWG

  1. 27 minutes ago, Wings said:

    Let's say the Oakland ballpark doesn't happen and we get the Portland A's & Montreal Expos (Rays). Expansion to 32 (if it happens) could come down to these candidates: 

     

    Nashville

    Charlotte

    Raleigh

    Las Vegas

     

     

     

    I do think that MLB will expand to 32 before the NBA does.  I think that the NBA is taking a "wait and see" approach in regards to Seattle. 

  2. 13 minutes ago, Wings said:

    Let's say the Oakland ballpark doesn't happen and we get the Portland A's & Montreal Expos (Rays). Expansion to 32 (if it happens) could come down to these candidates: 

     

    Nashville

    Charlotte

    Raleigh

    Las Vegas

     

     

     

    Las Vegas again?  They already have NHL and NFL.  Now they want MLS and MLB?  Is Las Vegas sustainable enough to hold 5 pro sports teams if the NBA goes there?

  3. 4 minutes ago, Brian in Boston said:

     

    Technically speaking, it took Dallas seven years to get three teams.

    Dallas Cowboys / National Football League / 1960-present
    Dallas Chaparrals / American Basketball Association / 1967-1970, 1971-1973
    Dallas Tornado / United Soccer Association-North American Soccer League / 1967-1981

    You really shouldn't dismiss the Chaparrals and Tornado. The Chaps spent 5 campaigns (six, when you count their 1970-71 season split between Dallas, Fort Worth, and Lubbock) in a league that lasted 9 seasons and forced a merger with the NBA. As for the Tornado, they played 15 seasons competing at what was the top tier of professional soccer in the United States and Canada at the time.  

     

    I meant NFL (Cowboys in 1960), MLB (Rangers in 1972) and NBA (Mavericks in 1980) among the leagues still around today.  Plus the Stars didn't arrive until 1993 and FC Dallas didn't arrive until 1996.

     

  4. 3 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

     

    The Angels have been discussing a new park, but hardly a stadium issue.  The D'backs, like Atlanta seems like they want a new park just to have a new park.  Their park is only what, 20 years old?  Again, hardly a stadium issue to the degree of Oakland and Tampa.

     

     

    It seems like the D-Backs want what the Cardinals have: a shiny new house to play in.

  5. 2 minutes ago, 63Bulldogs63 said:

    While need is subjective, I see it working. Vegas is an always populated city. The locals there are huge sports fans and would be no less support than the Ray's or A's or Marlins get currently. Couple that with the tourism aspect and the influx weekly of new people, could easily make up the rest of a capacity for the stadium to sell out.

     

    (While in the A's case I feel like they have a great fan base, coliseum is a dump and that :censored:ty neighborhood probably scares away people from the games. Also it seems that city of oakland doesn't care about sports anymore, politically speaking.)

     

    My issue is that Las Vegas is getting three major league teams too fast.  I live in Dallas, a much bigger city than Las Vegas and it took 20 years for Dallas to get three teams. 

  6. 2 minutes ago, 63Bulldogs63 said:

     

    That could be the plan all along to put a kibosh to the notion of bringing baseball back to Montreal. This team will eventually be in Nashville or Vegas

     

    This does not need to happen.  They already have the NHL, the NFL is coming and they are going after an MLS team.  Vegas doesn't need to go from 0 pro teams in 2015 to potentially 4 by 2021. 

    • Like 3
  7. 3 minutes ago, Magic Dynasty said:

    Good luck getting the city/county/state to pay for anything, since they just built the Amway Center, Dr. Phillips Center (a theater), and did major renovations to the Citrus Bowl with public money. Orlando City tried to get tax dollars to build OC Stadium and got hard rejected.

     

    Didn't Pro Player/Joe Robbie/Dolphins/Land Shark/Sun Life/Hard Rock Stadium go through major renovations when the Marlins left?

    • Like 3
  8. 4 minutes ago, gosioux76 said:

    From the sounds of it, Oakland is on far firmer ground than they've ever been. Their waterfront ballpark plan still has skeptics, but it's gaining in public support. 

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/philmatier/article/Oakland-council-taking-its-time-wants-answers-13969521.php?psid=aQkeR

     

     

    It may be farther along, but it's not a done deal, far from it and things could easily go south. 

    • Like 1
  9. 2 minutes ago, gosioux76 said:

    My suspicion is that neither the Rays ownership nor Major League Baseball actually expects this scenario to play out as described. It's a long and complicated scheme to solve the league's Tampa problem, bring baseball back to Montreal, and finally start Manfred's long-awaited league expansion process. 

     

    Once Tampa solves their stadium issue, MLB isn't going to expand.  They won't until Oakland solves their own stadium issues.

  10. 34 minutes ago, Magic Dynasty said:

    This reminds me of the Jaguars proposal to half relocate to London a few years back, where they would have a "US base" in Jacksonville and play their playoff and primetime games there, and every other game in London. It was dumb then, and it's still dumb now.

     

    Didn't the Jaguars end up reducing their London games to one? 

  11. 7 minutes ago, Seadragon76 said:

    Would Kentucky State even have the financial resources to even consider a jump to Division 1?

     

    The last two HBCU's to make this jump (Winston-Salem State and Savannah State) are back in Division II and a third HBCU, Morris Brown, doesn't even exist anymore. This would be a very, very risky gamble on their part. 

     

    The Southland Conference has had more success with former Division II schools with Abilene Christian, Incarnate Word and the University of New Orleans.  I wonder how many SWAC schools the Southland Conference would take in if that league was to fold?

  12. 8 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said:

     

    Eh, I'd say that's it's a more distinct difference. The Orange Curtain is a very real phenomenon.

     

    61v0PNKIQkL._SX324_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

     

     

    I would argue that it is. It's more different than Brooklyn is from Manhattan. Besides, what was the name of the team that won it all in 2002?

     

    a_angels1_i.jpg

     

    Los Angeles outside of Orange Country doesn't want the Angels, so why should they act otherwise? They're Orange County's team, in the same way that the A's are Oakland's team or the Dodgers were Brooklyn's team. 

     

    For now.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.