Meshmaster101 Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 every time i watch old football games when reebok did the uniforms, i always thought that it looked nicer. probably a mixture of the material the jerseys were made out of among other things, but I was comparing the two and I realized that uniforms with TV numbers on the outside of the shoulder are thinner on the nike jerseys. (probably to match the chest/back numbers) vs i honestly think that the way reebok did it is a lot nicer the chiefs did it too, honestly wish they kept it that way what yall think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimmick Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 from those photos i would say Nike is doing it better. there is more "air" around the number forms and is easier to read. bonus points for the modern jersey material, where the older jerseys were glossier the reflection of light also didn't help legibility. GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 I do really like the oversized numbers, but it’s a thing of the past and Nike is doing a good job of handling their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 I like the wider TV numbers better, but I don't think Washington's change to thinner TV numbers had anything to do with Nike. Other teams around the league have kept the wider numbers in the Nike era. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.