sharplcd Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 i just noticed that the terror could be a good logo for the toronto raptors. especially that logo with the T and shadow of the dinosaur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YELDARBfield Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 GreenA - 1 - Very nice job.B - 1 - Glory looked more like the AFL. Havoc looked af2-ish.GreyA - 1 - Both were great, came down to the AFL look.B - 1 - See Grey A.All entries were fantastic. Several mistakes, though. The Incarnate had an 100 yd. field. Most entries that had a brand logo on it weren't Nike. The AFL has all of the teams equipment, excluding helmets, and unis outfitted by one company-Nike. Gotta do your research. Twitter • Facebook • Instagram • LinkedIn • Tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted June 12, 2006 Share Posted June 12, 2006 GreenA - 1 - Very nice job.B - 1 - Glory looked more like the AFL. Havoc looked af2-ish.GreyA - 1 - Both were great, came down to the AFL look.B - 1 - See Grey A.All entries were fantastic. Several mistakes, though. The Incarnate had an 100 yd. field. Most entries that had a brand logo on it weren't Nike. The AFL has all of the teams equipment, excluding helmets, and unis outfitted by one company-Nike. Gotta do your research. Well, I would have voted based on the quality of each design, not on how "AFL-ish" it was. But, that's just me. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted June 12, 2006 Share Posted June 12, 2006 GreenA - 1 - Very nice job.B - 1 - Glory looked more like the AFL. Havoc looked af2-ish.GreyA - 1 - Both were great, came down to the AFL look.B - 1 - See Grey A.All entries were fantastic. Several mistakes, though. The Incarnate had an 100 yd. field. Most entries that had a brand logo on it weren't Nike. The AFL has all of the teams equipment, excluding helmets, and unis outfitted by one company-Nike. Gotta do your research. Well, I would have voted based on the quality of each design, not on how "AFL-ish" it was. But, that's just me. agreed, this was done on how great the design was, oh well so they didn't use Nike what is that going to get them? Negative points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YELDARBfield Posted June 12, 2006 Share Posted June 12, 2006 GreenA - 1 - Very nice job.B - 1 - Glory looked more like the AFL. Havoc looked af2-ish.GreyA - 1 - Both were great, came down to the AFL look.B - 1 - See Grey A.All entries were fantastic. Several mistakes, though. The Incarnate had an 100 yd. field. Most entries that had a brand logo on it weren't Nike. The AFL has all of the teams equipment, excluding helmets, and unis outfitted by one company-Nike. Gotta do your research. Well, I would have voted based on the quality of each design, not on how "AFL-ish" it was. But, that's just me. agreed, this was done on how great the design was, oh well so they didn't use Nike what is that going to get them? Negative points There were no bad looking concepts. Most of the ones that were close to me, I based my decision on the challenge: "Make an expansion team for the Arena Football League." Just like some of you would say "the NFL wouldn't allow that/not something the NFL would do," I decided by what the AFL would do.Also, if a league uses a certain uni template or only had one outfitter for their unis, then the concept should be based on that. If you do an NFL concept, you would either put a Reebok logo on it or you wouldn't put a logo on it at all. Plus, simple things like the field size are common sense. That's just one thing that gave "negative Points" to the Incarnate concept. Twitter • Facebook • Instagram • LinkedIn • Tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameCock82 Posted June 13, 2006 Author Share Posted June 13, 2006 congrats fellas on a splendid round.....but yet again elimination is present.GreenGame A Team 1 (GMS)Game B Team 1 w/ 23 votes (LightblueNC)GreyGame A Team 1 w/ 27 votes (Roxstar)Game B Team 2 w/ 23 votes (Paynomind) -s82.designs.webpage-Brilliams!Ownership -CFA: South Beach Sharks -NCFA: 2007 Beantown Bowl Champions; BNE Co-Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.