~boshalladay~ Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 Welcome to my thread where I plan on switching up stuff, like crossovers, NOTE: All my work is done in Paint so it isn't the best quality.Batter up.Bucks Baseball:C&C Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steiny_ramone Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 See most of Patsox's concepts. Most of the C+C from those will apply here. facespace?http://www.myspace.com/seancalcottmusic http://www.myspace.com/forgottentoys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ltravisjr Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 I kind of like the away uniform, although I would probably prefer all the letters to be the same size. The home needs more development. Those green sleeves are a bit overpowering on an otherwise simple jersey. I would either make them white or add some striping/piping to the jersey to integrate things a little better and make the sleeve color not look like a mere afterthought. I would make the home pants just like the away pants, but white instead of gray. Finally, I would keep the M hat only, but either make it a white M or outline it in white so it stands out better. It is a little messy, but I have seen plenty worse...HTH,LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonz Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 See most of Patsox's concepts. Most of the C+C from those will apply here. I second that. Nice try though, this could go somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~boshalladay~ Posted August 5, 2006 Author Share Posted August 5, 2006 Ok, I've worked on this for a while taking some C&C into affect and I came up with Brewers basketball. There is some interesting striping, something you've probably never seen:It's more messy than the Bucks one, but take a better look at the design then the quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonz Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 Its hard to judge design properly if the quality is poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 See most of Patsox's concepts. Most of the C+C from those will apply here. ouch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eye Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 These are alright for a start, but you gotta clean 'em up, man. I know it's your first concept, so I won't tear you to shreds. I posted my first concept for a baseball team about week ago. It wasn't too good because it was my first try, but it was clean, no gray pixels, nothing distracting. If you clean these up, they will definitely look a lot better. Right now, it's blurry and messy, which detracts from what you are trying to show us. Take your time, man. By the looks of these, you have potential with these designs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~boshalladay~ Posted August 7, 2006 Author Share Posted August 7, 2006 Here's a clean home:Is that cleaner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steiny_ramone Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 See most of Patsox's concepts. Most of the C+C from those will apply here. ouch Wasn't trying to offend anybody, just thought I'd point out that in the last few months there's been a lot of concepts without much thought given towards neatness. Most of them have been done by Patsox. He's gotten better I think, though. Anyways, the point is that these have the same issues as Patsox's and if he looks at those threads he can see how concepts like this are responded to. facespace?http://www.myspace.com/seancalcottmusic http://www.myspace.com/forgottentoys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~boshalladay~ Posted August 8, 2006 Author Share Posted August 8, 2006 See most of Patsox's concepts. Most of the C+C from those will apply here. ouch Wasn't trying to offend anybody, just thought I'd point out that in the last few months there's been a lot of concepts without much thought given towards neatness. Most of them have been done by Patsox. He's gotten better I think, though. Anyways, the point is that these have the same issues as Patsox's and if he looks at those threads he can see how concepts like this are responded to. I hear you but unlike that idiot Patsox, I'm trying to iprove and be on more of a scale of Statix, which is harder than it looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.