BadSeed84 Posted July 22, 2010 Share Posted July 22, 2010 This picture bugs me cause the vets roof never was that bighere the pic im talking aboutand here a pic of the vet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TopCat Posted July 22, 2010 Share Posted July 22, 2010 Look at the parking lot. Probably a mockup or something. facebook | @thebugcollector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper Posted July 22, 2010 Share Posted July 22, 2010 "Artist's conception" pictures seldom look exactly like the real thing. This is probably just another example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted July 22, 2010 Share Posted July 22, 2010 Other concepts:http://www.stadiumpage.com/stpages/veterans.htmlhttp://www.stadiumpage.com/stpages/phil00.htmlhttp://www.stadiumpage.com/stpages/philly65.html "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted July 22, 2010 Share Posted July 22, 2010 The trees are a dead giveaway.Parking lots are always half-full of trees in any picture intended to sell the project to the client or the taxpayers. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted July 25, 2010 Author Share Posted July 25, 2010 The 65 rectangle stadium wouldve been interesting, would've been like a bigger baker bowl lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camden Crazy Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 The 2nd or 3rd one would've been awesome, especially the one that was right downtown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 http://www.stadiumpage.com/stpages/philly65.htmlMaybe someone can explain this to me, but I never understood why the so-called "concrete donut" became the standard model for multi-purpose stadiums when quadrilateral designs seem to provide better sightlines for both sports. Even parks like Memorial Stadium and the Polo Grounds seemed to do their co-hosting duties better despite being from years before the idea of multi-purpose stadiums really took off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Well technically, the Vet was an octarad, not really a donut like Three Rivers, Riverfront, Busch, etc. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.