thinkkre8tiv Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Because of legal issues with the AFL owning the rights and trademarks for the Amarillo Dusters the team management decided to hold a competition to name the new team. The result is the Amarillo Venom. For some reason however I feel like I have seen this logo before. So can someone help me out here in this??Here is the new Amarillo Venom.Flynnagain.com designed the Amarillo Dusters previous brand.Then 2 years ago the team management decided to recolor the team into red and black. I assume this is when the new ownership took over. This could have also been completed to match the local CHL hockey team here the Amarillo Gorillas. Which rarely uses the complete logo now. BartODell.comPublished LogoLounge 4, 5, 6 & 8 , LogoLounge Master Series 1, 2, 3, & 4 , Really Good Logos , LogoNest 3: B&W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickenfish13 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 That is one sick logo! Nicely done to whoever designed it, it does seem kind of familiar though... dribbble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJworks Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 The top two are ridiculously sweet. I really like that orange Dusters one over the red, should have never left. Dribbble | Twitter | Facebook | Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 My only problem with this logo is that the wordmark should be primarily White, with the lower tips of the "V" and "M" being Red. In that way, it would look as if the wordmark's fangs were tipped with the blood of a just-bitten victim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackjack76 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 It appears that a black outline around the gold/copper outline around the snake head is missing. You somewhat see it near the V, but it ENOM runs right into the gold/copper outline. Sloppy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckymack Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Anyone else notice the use of a human foot in the Gorillas logo?! You think someone woulda caught that...For those of you that don't know, gorilla feet resemble human hands moreso than human feet. Sigs are for sissies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stDownCreative Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 i messed around with the wordmark and came up with this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee. Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Wow, man, that's so much better than what they have now, you should totally submit it, they should use that instead of what they have. Welcome to DrunjFlix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinkkre8tiv Posted February 10, 2010 Author Share Posted February 10, 2010 So does anyone notice the similarity with this one? Or am I being to critical? BartODell.comPublished LogoLounge 4, 5, 6 & 8 , LogoLounge Master Series 1, 2, 3, & 4 , Really Good Logos , LogoNest 3: B&W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stDownCreative Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 too critical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Apollo Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 too criticalThen call me too critical as well because thats the first thing I thought of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinkkre8tiv Posted February 16, 2010 Author Share Posted February 16, 2010 too criticalThen call me too critical as well because thats the first thing I thought of.As did I. BartODell.comPublished LogoLounge 4, 5, 6 & 8 , LogoLounge Master Series 1, 2, 3, & 4 , Really Good Logos , LogoNest 3: B&W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordie_delini Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 I see it Bart - I also think the one you posted is a much better execution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallWonk Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 I see it Bart - I also think the one you posted is a much better execution.The similarities are obvious, but the two are quite distinct from one another. Basic issues of shape and form, along with most of the details, make these clearly different treatments. And here's another very impressed vote for your reworking of the logo. Vastly superior, and an example of how tweaking just a few details can make the difference between adequate and awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinkkre8tiv Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 I see it Bart - I also think the one you posted is a much better execution.The similarities are obvious, but the two are quite distinct from one another. Basic issues of shape and form, along with most of the details, make these clearly different treatments. And here's another very impressed vote for your reworking of the logo. Vastly superior, and an example of how tweaking just a few details can make the difference between adequate and awesome.BallWonk... I did not design this. BartODell.comPublished LogoLounge 4, 5, 6 & 8 , LogoLounge Master Series 1, 2, 3, & 4 , Really Good Logos , LogoNest 3: B&W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallWonk Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I see it Bart - I also think the one you posted is a much better execution.The similarities are obvious, but the two are quite distinct from one another. Basic issues of shape and form, along with most of the details, make these clearly different treatments. And here's another very impressed vote for your reworking of the logo. Vastly superior, and an example of how tweaking just a few details can make the difference between adequate and awesome.BallWonk... I did not design this.I know. I meant my "you" in the second paragraph to refer to 1stDownCreative. This is what pronouns with unclear referents will get you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ_Barlik Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 I like the new logo, but agree with the poster who said the word Venom should be white with red tips - either that or the tips could be white with red at the very bottom simulating blood dripping off. 5-time Defending NL East Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.