Jump to content

damnyoutuesday

Members
  • Posts

    1,008
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by damnyoutuesday

  1. It's not bad. The Rams are bad. This is just boring. There's nothing bad about this set other than it's very basic. It is the Houston Astros of the NFL
  2. I'd say overall, the non-white monochrome look doesn't work for ~95% of looks. IMO, the Seahawks mono-navy actually works, and they've owned that look. Their all grey also works (but that's closer to white). I honestly can't really point out another NFL team where it works
  3. Regardless of facemask, the current Vikings helmet with the satin finish is miles ahead of the gloss helmet. When they fixed the color to match the jersey, they made it perfect
  4. Dear god no... There isn't even enough gold on the uniform to justify having a color that bright on the helmet
  5. That set was so stupidly clean and inoffensive, PLUS they won a title in it, and they decided to change it for some reason to the current monstrosities
  6. The Peter Man holds a place near and dear in every NFL fan's heart
  7. The new jags set is a perfect example of perfectly acceptable, but bland. The set looks nice. There's nothing inherently wrong with it. It's just got nothing exciting. It's literally one color with a different color number and tiny details on the sleeves and pants.
  8. My pet peeves with that 49ers uniform are the sleeve logos and the gold around the white numbers. If they looked like that concept but with shiny pants, they would be perfect
  9. Where did you hear Green Bay will have an alternate
  10. Technically the Texans added their logo above the nameplate 2(?) seasons ago, so they might be considered out of the running
  11. UCLA has a racial justice patch covering the UA mark on the jerseys. UA mark is still visible on pants, cleats, and accessories
  12. Minnesota going chrome/maroon/maroon vs Michigan
  13. Montana State will have new jerseys for the spring season Stripes have been moved to the sleeves from the shoulders, and the generic UA block font has been changed to the Montana State wordmark used by the athletic department Old New
  14. Missoula osprey have 2 new cap logos (M and fish in talons) and they got rid of the O logo
  15. The current Seahawks set is better than their previous set
  16. Yep. With pants to match. I kind of like that and don't think it would be that bad with matching pants. I've always maintained it is only a matter of time before colored pants make a comeback in mlb. I kinda dig those for an away uni. Can we get a Yankees minor league team to try them out?
  17. Not sure how unpopular this is, but red hats with blue bills are the most beautiful thing and there should be way more teams that wear them https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CEQ6V5UWIAEYf0e.jpg http://www.minnpost.com/sites/default/files/asset/0/0413ac/0413ac.jpg http://content.sportslogos.net/news/2013/07/Screen-shot-2013-07-16-at-17.50.57-.png
  18. No, depends on what kind of shorts, and no. There's no rule for most courses that say you can't wear shorts, it's just that the pros choose not to wear them
  19. Hornets 2.0 vs. any team changing unis next season: Bucks, Hawks, Sixers, Raptors, Browns.That hornets-browns game was one of the best in years
  20. Off-white MLB jerseys are the best http://content.sportslogos.net/news/2014/05/MLB-Cream-Baseball-Uniforms-2014.jpg Except the Indians. I'm not a huge fan of those (is that an unpopular opinion?)
  21. This beauty that the New England Patriots proposed http://www.sportslogos.net/logos/view/ya8qoagwzweacwl1431mhfsef/New_England_Patriots/1978/Unused_Logo
  22. The Los Angeles Lakers. A team so lazy, they kept a nickname that only made sense when they were in Minneapolis. Most people couldn't tell you why they're called the Lakers, BECAUSE LOS ANGELES DOESN'T HAVE ANY FREAKING LAKES https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/a8/fe/0c/a8fe0c385cac613368cdb151d5db571e.jpg
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.