LEWJ Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 [out of date] | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCBoy Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Eh, nice share, I might use these from time to time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swilson160 Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 These are nice. But your Cowboys' one is missing 27 shades of grey/silver and 17 shades of blue...or maybe that's 26 of grey and 18 of blue, depending on what you call the home pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uga_dawgs24 Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 I like these, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Cool, but the Packers have not been using that wordmark since 1959. It dates to the mid-1970s. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 FYI, You have your 'history' on these all skewed and incorrect... at least half of the logos you have here, the "in use date" is incorrect. MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted September 19, 2007 Author Share Posted September 19, 2007 I used the dates from chris' site....so yea. that explains it?!And I'm just doing the "Logo colors" not the uniform/helmet colors.I'm not listing textile colors. So that explains the reason why I didnt put the extra 78 shades for the cowboys.[if the color is listed as "Uniform only" or "Helmet only" or anything klike that than I'm not listing it.][sSUR is my resource btw :] | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 I used the dates from chris' site....so yea. that explains it?!I hate to admit it, but that does explain the date inaccuracies.Chris' site is not flawless. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremyb Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 looks great, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ltravisjr Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Nice collection, and it should be a helpful resource. Heck, if nothing else, I learned the term "quaternary logo".LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pagan696 Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 some of the Panthers logos are incorrect, but they were taken from CCs (and those still haven't been updated ) Carolina Dreamin' ΓΔΒ ΓΔΒ ΓΔΒ When a robotic Nixon is on the loose, we have a duty to take action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted September 21, 2007 Author Share Posted September 21, 2007 If you guys are so positive the dates are off, you wanna help provide the right dates? That would be quite nice. Any C&C is nice, do you think the fonts for "Primary Logo" and the dates etc. are ok? Too big? What about font color etc? I'd like to make these as nice as possible. Thanks. | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Can't help you with the Packers - I suspect that the logo was introduced in 1975, but haven't been able to confirm. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted September 24, 2007 Author Share Posted September 24, 2007 Cool, but the Packers have not been using that wordmark since 1959. It dates to the mid-1970s.I guess I'm not sure what you're talking about... Because last I saw, the packers used it in their endzones, and the endzone walls. | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Cool, but the Packers have not been using that wordmark since 1959. It dates to the mid-1970s.I guess I'm not sure what you're talking about... Because last I saw, the packers used it in their endzones, and the endzone walls.He's saying it doesn't go BACK as far as 1959 but instead was introduced in the mid-70's. MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted September 24, 2007 Author Share Posted September 24, 2007 Cool, but the Packers have not been using that wordmark since 1959. It dates to the mid-1970s.I guess I'm not sure what you're talking about... Because last I saw, the packers used it in their endzones, and the endzone walls.He's saying it doesn't go BACK as far as 1959 but instead was introduced in the mid-70's.gotchawow. sorry lol | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Yep, that's what I was trying to say. I don't know how long they've been using the current wordmark (it's hard to find examples, as football teams didn't really use consistent wordmark logos on programs, merchandise, etc until just a few years ago), but I can tell you with conviction that it doesn't go back that long. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.