-
Posts
5,988 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by LEWJ
-
There’s been a few! (Although this one had no front number the first season worn)
-
This is getting weird. Might just be my brain
-
I guess if we’re getting technical the sun is classified as a star… meteors are not edit: I’m realizing i basically paraphrased what you said. For emphasis.. er something
-
Ohio State Baseball as of today:
-
Sharing post from UniSwag for visual reference
-
Did they mean 30 million years? I’m no geologist, but… I’ll see myself out. The Marlins one seems like a memorial for someone who wore #30 and won two ‘ships. Or something..?
-
Quoting for emphasis.
-
Oddly enough, it was the other way around in real life. Regarding the colors. Browns practiced at BGSU in 40s and adopted their scheme. The more you know! https://sanduskyregister.com/news/297349/bgsu-inspired-browns-colors/
-
My real issue is with the “M” cap. As everyone and their brother has noted, it is much too similar to the former Marlins cap. Especially at a distance. Not to be dramatic, but they need to address that. Fwiw, I don’t really buy the idea that it was a necessity for the fans either. If they wanted to further embrace fans from outside of the twin cities, that home alternate was certainly a choice. But I get it, caps sell. (But i don’t think this one will.) Only other gripe is the Twin Cities set. Byeeee. It adds nothing to the set. I see what they’re doing, but it’s nothing anyone wants to see more than once a year. And quite honestly looks like something they’d put on an unlicensed shirt or jersey. Edit for additional thoughts: i really do love the “cleanliness” Of the set and identity as a whole, I think minus the above this could be an instant classic. Also, I don’t find it necessary for the home script to match the road wordmark/new font, as some suggest. I get what people are saying, but to me it’s just personal preference. It’s a font now, and it *does* compliment the home script, just not how everyone wants it to. In my opinion, of course haha
-
Dare I say it meshes with the uniform striping BETTER this way? Sign me up.
-
“…uh…dad, are they wearing pants?”
-
South Carolina looking mighty fine tonight. Wow
-
Here’s a look at the Cavaliers new uniforms in game action. https://www.nba.com/cavaliers/photos/photogallery-clephi-221005
-
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1892_Yale_Bulldogs_football_team#/media/File%3A1892_Yale_Bulldogs.jpg edit: 1892 national champs. Whatever that means, they claim 27 of them
-
Yea, one or two VTs was probably enough edit: I’ve already looked at it too many times. Now it just looks like an odd mathematical symbol.
-
Definitely! I just watched the video posted too. Great execution on the motion graphics, what a cool idea.
-
Big fan here
-
I would love to know who else used this font in 2010 news to me
-
Bringing this back because it took me too long to find This reminded me…
-
Saw this on Twitter and I thought it might be appropriate to share.
-
I actually like the new V-star logo, awkward This one doesn’t actually look better to me, it just seems to make the “V” look extra squatty.
-
This is hilariously close to what I texted my buddies the other day. Text copied below, along with the pic I provided. “I do love traditional looks but i think the cardinals should really lean into it. The stuff they wear now is so stale… I'm honestly all for a rebrand similar to the browns. They are one of the oldest teams.” (Later I added: THE OLDEST*) I think the Lomax era had the Cardinal between the stripes and TV numbers, otherwise close to the same. It’s just beautiful ugh
-
It looks as though they tried to make it appear as both a Knights’ helmet and a football helmet. I feel like the shadow kind of shows that, could just be me.