NJTank Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 Hey there somebody brought this to my attention and was wondering what the story behind it is.Its a jersey that the seller is calling a never used prototyehttp://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...&category=20855 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winters in buffalo Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 That's awful. His story is wrong, too. Even if they stayed in Quebec, there was already a different jersey in the works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 My guess this might have been a proposed new uniform for 1991 but it got axed and never used.I think it is a design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTitan Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 "... Kind of ironic they used Joe's number backwards... Check out my other awesome auctions.... Good Luck." That leads me to believe that this is a made up jersey for sale, thats not even including the fact they he just happens to have a one of a kind that they never ever used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickNickNick Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 I like it, but 102.50$? That's ridiculous.And it's not ironic. It's stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Clemente Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 That is a way nicer jersey than the proposed ones. I never liked that wolf logo, don't know why.That said, I have a feeling this is a fake. The fact the CCM logo is not right at the bottom of the jersey like it always was is one sign. However, it has the NHL shield, like an authentic, and the elbow patchs sewn in. That said, the tag you can see in the collar is not a CCM tag. The CC is in red squares, the M in blue squares. In the tag, all we can see is a blue something, and it looks like it isn't a similar size.Prognosis: fake, but a convincing one.Also, what on earth is so ironic about using the number 91?--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee. Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 Didn't Sakic start out wearing 91? Or am I smoking the cheap crack again?and how the hell did I lose 40 posts off my point count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Clemente Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 Sakic wore 88 when he was first drafted.I also lost 40-some posts off my count, especially considering that I had maybe ten posts total in that word association game.--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 Actually guys, I'm pretty sure that was a proposed jersey. I don't recall when, but I know they had more than just the wolf logo ones. They had some proposed ones in the old scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 24, 2004 Author Share Posted February 24, 2004 Check out this page scroll down and see a Stars proposed jersey with gold numbers.http://www.dropthepucks.com/Bigsale.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckguy14 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Paging Phocused! I remember seeing the road jersey like that ebay jersey on Phocused's website. I think these were in consideration along with the Husky-Wolf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampart Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 The striping on the Nords jersey looks identical to the striping used by the Penguins (until 1992). This may be a custom job that someone is trying to make a buck on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etchells Posted February 28, 2004 Share Posted February 28, 2004 The jersey also has the NHL logo on it. I don't think the NHL was putting that on jerseys back in 1991. Looks to me like someone paid a lot of money for a fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.