mcrosby Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Living here in Wisconsin I have developed a dislike for the placement of NHL teams in the south. Many of these markets are not meant for hockey, and have trouble staying afloat (Nashville, Phoenix). I set up a re-alignment of the NHL that moves teams to former areas, all of which have an actual interest in hockey. Some areas are a bit condensed with teams, but all have the fan support for more than 1 team...we know how dey love der hockey in Canada eh!Anyways, here is the realignment, with new teams in bold.New JerseyPittsburgh PhiladelphiaWashingtonColumbusDetroitChicagoMinnesotaMilwaukeeWinnipegAtlantaColoradoDallasLos AngelesSt. Louis New YorkBuffaloTorontoHamiltonQuebecVancouverCalgarySeattleEdmontonCaliforniaNew YorkMontrealHartfordBostonOttowaAlong with this re-alignment I have made concepts for each of the new teams and will be posting them from time to time. I would LOVE for some C&C for each.First up, the Quebec Nordiques.Now that you're done celebrating their return, the Nordiques keep their old logos. I was going to try to come in with something new, but the old is just so classic. So I stuck with the old, with a few tweaks, nothing major. The unis are a bit different, meant to stay somewhat simple. After Quebec has been properly criticized and whatnot the California Seals make a return-replacing Anaheim and San Jose in one swipe. https://twitter.com/OutOfThisWC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
officeglenn Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I don't know about this one. I dig the striping from the collars down the sides, but the half fleurs-de-lis don't really work for me. I'd also like to see the full-on red Nordiques logo back, especially on the blue jersey ? the blue logo gets completely lost against the blue background. The sleeves need something ? anything ? too. They look awfully bare with just the numbers and the thin stripes at the cuffs. Maybe some striping mid-arm that mirrors the pattern going down the sides? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Does Art Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I'm not a fan of the realignment.You took Ottawa and Montreal out of a division with the leafs and replaced them with New York and Quebec? If Quebec is in there why take out Montreal? Same with New York and Ottawa. You take The Rangers (I assume) out of a division with the Devils and put them in with a bunch of random teams from the Northeast.Then you go from Atlanta to Los Angeles all in one division, which makes no sense. Now the jersey is alright, but like Officeglenn said, the half fleurs-de-lis seem sort of awkward. I would add something to the sleeves too. Hi, how are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcrosby Posted April 27, 2009 Author Share Posted April 27, 2009 I will re-work the re-alignment later. The major point of this was to get teams out of the south and back into the north/Canada. Shanurr, if you would like to take a stab at re-aligning be my guest. In the mean team I'll be working on the critiques you've given me thus far. https://twitter.com/OutOfThisWC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcoyotes Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 You can't take San Jose away thats ridiculous on so many levels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliott Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I'm not a fan of the realignment.You took Ottawa and Montreal out of a division with the leafs and replaced them with New York and Quebec? If Quebec is in there why take out Montreal? Same with New York and Ottawa. You take The Rangers (I assume) out of a division with the Devils and put them in with a bunch of random teams from the Northeast.Then you go from Atlanta to Los Angeles all in one division, which makes no sense. Now the jersey is alright, but like Officeglenn said, the half fleurs-de-lis seem sort of awkward. I would add something to the sleeves too.I agree here. Atlanta to LA is a ridiculous travel expectation. That division needs work, it's just really spread out. And yeah, I wouldn't mess too much with the 2 divisions with canadian teams. They seem to work well and have good rivalries.You can't take San Jose away thats ridiculous on so many levelsWhile this is obviously a homer-based remark, it does have some truth. They are a successful franchise and it's hard to get rid of that source of attendance. Dribbble ... Behance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcrosby Posted April 27, 2009 Author Share Posted April 27, 2009 Here's an update of Quebec. I kept the half fleur-de-lis because I think they look better with the added sleeve stripes. If you all disagree I can change it. And to add to things here are the California Seals. The idea is to replace the Sharks and the Ducks with this team. California is just too darn warm for that much hockey.I kept the old colors, and name obviously. The font is that of the Ducks. The template is a modified All-Star template. C&C please.next up-Hartford Whalers https://twitter.com/OutOfThisWC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexHorky Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 Ok, I really don't get a lot of what's going on with your realignment/contraction. The two New York teams moved out of a division with tri-state rivals New Jersey and Philly. If Quebec comes back, they've gotta be with Montreal and Ottawa, no way around it. Come on, Atlanta and Los Angeles in the same division? And really, yes, its warm in California, but San Jose and Anaheim are sold out most nights. Hamilton and Hartford, despite their northern climate, are just not big enough to accommodate the attendance/ticket price needs of an NHL team and the private boxes that would need to be filled, since the NHL is a gate-driven league and teams don't get a lot of support from TV contracts like the NFL or NBA. Also, Tampa Bay is a fine market, once again in spite of its geographical location, but the fans are currently a little put off with the way ownership runs things.How's about this:New YorkLong IslandNew JerseyPhiladelphiaPittsburghBostonOttawaMontrealQuebecBuffaloKansas CityTampaColumbusWashingtonCarolinaDetroitChicagoSt. LouisTorontoMinnesotaSeattleVancouverCalgaryEdmontonColoradoSan JoseAnaheimHoustonDallasLos AngelesMost of it makes geographical sense, except the third division, which I guess COULD be called the Southern Division, the problem is Kansas City. It could be in St. Louis' spot but the Blues NEED to be in the same division as Detroit and Chicago for the purposes of ticket revenue. No offence to Steeltown or Winnipeg but I don't think the support would be there. Maybe in Winnipeg because they lost it once and they would be scared of losing it again, but Winnipeg did lose its team because of a lack of support, remember, the Jets were on average 2500 tickets unsold every game from 1990 onward. Hamilton had three AHL or OHL failed teams before the Bulldogs came about and the Bulldogs have surpassed 2,000,000 in attendance....in 13 seasons...over 520 home games...roughly a 4000 person attendance. The Marlies do that well at the gate and theyre very disrespected her in Toronto. <a target="_blank" title="Scoreboard Widget" alt="Scoreboards" href="http://www.electro-mech.com/scoreboards/widget/"><img border='0' src="http://www.electro-mech.com/banners/hockey/330_90-Montreal_Canadiens-Toronto_Maple_Leafs.png"></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aci Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 With those locations, doing an alignment is going to be a pain no matter how you do it. I think this would be better, though. Note that I didn't use a map, which would have probably made this a tad easier. It'll suck to be in the Southeast division no matter how you work it, I think.SoutheastAtlantaColoradoWashingtonSt LouisDallasNortheastBostonMontrealQuebecOttawaHartfordAtlanticPhiladelphiaNew YorkPittsburghNew JerseyNew YorkCentralTorontoHamiltonBuffaloDetroitColumbusPacificLos AngelesCaliforniaSeattleVancouverCalgaryNorthwestEdmontonWinnipegMilwaukeeChicagoMinnesota Hamilton Eagles- 2012 and 2013 Continental Hockey League Champions! 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 & 2015 CHL East Division Champions! Niagara Dragoons- 2012 United League and CCSLC World Series Champions! 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 UL Robinson Division Champions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conundrum_2 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 Hmmm. my thoughts to Re-alignments.... with complete respects to our Western franchises and their travel costs.Mind you, though, this would have a tremendously diffciult time getting accepted by the BoG's... but hey let's put the idea out there anyway. Make it similar to MLB, with two conferences but have both conferences have an equal spread of teams so that their travel costs are all about the same. No more of this Eastern time zone heavy league with their bus travels to the next game, meanwile West coast teams are air-travel heavy coming through the time-zones.10 Eastern teams all in close proximity to each other in one conference? Not anymore. Now there's 5 teams each in TWO conferences. 10 teams in the Pacific Time zone right now? Nope. Now just five teams each in TWO conferences. The remaining Central time zone teams get split evenly into the two conferences.It'd give teams that couldn't possibly have a chance (as the Conferences are split now) have the possibility of meeting in the Finals for the cup .... imagine the Rangers and Islanders cup finals (okay, it's a huuuuuuge stretch). Or how about a West coast final? Vancouver vs Edmonton? Anaheim vs. LA? Or how about: Ottawa vs Toronto? Ottawa vs. Montreal? Buffalo vs. Toronto? Hmmm....I, at least think this idea merits a teeny tiny consideration. Whatcha think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Does Art Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 Jesus. A map would have helped you.Colorado is closer west than some teams you have in the western side of it. Hi, how are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.