And Nashville is more of a cultural fit in the Southeast than Columbus. /What good is ease of travel when your fans don't travel anyway? Meh I've never thought of it being a cultural fit. I've always thought of it as a locational fit. And Columbus clearly fits in better with the rest of the East. /Columbus fits in better with Washington and arguably Raleigh anyways. What's Raleigh like culturally? //Still thinks everyone's thinking of the Southeast Division as including Atlanta as far as Nashville fitting better... Nashville is a geographically southeastern city. Columbus is a northern Midwestern town. Which makes more sense? Plus as shown above, the overall and average mileage shows that Nashville makes more sense in the southeast division than Columbus does. I wouldn't call Nashville a geographically southeastern city any more than I would call Columbus a geographically northeastern city. Columbus is further East than Nashville. Nashville in the Western Conference, Columbus in the Eastern Conference. OK, let's approach it from this tack since reason seems to have trouble registering here. I think the good people of Nashville are going to take more pleasure in watching the hometown team beat down their fellow Southerners in Raleigh, Miami, Tampa Bay, and Washington than some teams in Yankeeland. Conversely, the people of Columbus, who really, really would like to see the hometown team play Detroit a lot (among others). Does that make sense to you? This is a professional league with a continent-wide footprint. Travel is really a tertiary concern, if that. No, we really, really don't like to see the hometown team play Detroit. What I'm saying is that Nashville isn't close to any Eastern Conference teams, while the Jackets are close to 6. Plus, if you're talking about attendance figures for the Detroit conversation, the CBJ draw just as well against Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal, Pittsburgh, and Washington. /Nashville still isn't close to a single Eastern Conference team.