WSU151

Ahh gotcha. Read it too fast.

Where can these patterns be seen in the photos below? I must be missing something.

New uniforms are on the way for all sports, which kinda sucks for football, as I thought they looked great the past two years. Hopefully they keep the same essential look. The Nikespeak on pretty much all these new marks is pretty nauseating. They mention "fierce" seemingly 89 times, and the font was based on circles and lines found on the Rotunda blueprints...because circles and lines are never found anywhere else. And there's some other nauseating lines...but MOD EDIT.

The beveling is bad, and the additional colors are weird choices. The logo on the left is trying to evoke this building (admissions building, I think. but rather iconic)

Looks like this tweet was deleted? Anyone get a grab?

A white hat with black jersey is an odd choice for primary road. I really like this set though...it's perfect for a Montana team.

I don't think there are beveled fonts on the helmet logo and wordmark...

UA did a good job with Temple, but some looks were a bit "extra". Temple is one of my favorite college identities, so hopefully Nike doesn't ruin it.

Good intentional design doesn't have to be gimmicky, though. The beveled numbers are really gimmicky, especially since the helmet logo doesn't have the bevel. I really don't think anything is gained here; in fact, the numbers would look way better if they were just flat.

I'd be in favor of that. I like the current helmets (not as much as the throwback above), but the unis with the beveled numbers are a bit tired.

Good concepts so far - the teal D-backs jersey is fantastic. I do like bringing back the vertical arc NOB for the Braves...that always looked good.

Hope they wear 100% cotton jerseys.

It's very good (not sure about the best). The jade/sea foam color is a great addition.

Upgrade for the Lobos, but they need to use the profile wolf logo that faces the front of the helmet. I always like the 90s version...but it's a bit of a mess.

Detroit Tigers need this "Tigers" wordmark on their page: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-MLB-DETROIT-TIGERS-PENNANT-30-1960s-1970s-Felt-Baseball-Team-Banner-/282932278379 Oakland A's need this "Oakland" wordmark: https://www.ebay.com/itm/OAKLAND-ATHLETICS-FULL-COLOR-OFFICIALLY-LICENSED-PENNANT/362720015214?hash=item5473cc336e:g:hmUAAOSwT~hdSgyE

This is the same guy who thinks the awkward/bent UK logo is better, right? Mitch's taste will be pretty awful until they bring back the big block K.

Kinda wish they left 2019 off. Would rather have a tiny W or nothing on the bottle.

They're navy. Same color as the Broncos.

No they don't.

2032 2016+16=2032

Most pistons don't look like this, so I think you used selection bias to make your assumption. Of the dozens of pictures of pistons on Google Image search, the above was the only one that looks similar, but not quite the same, to the Pistons' logo. Most pistons look like this: And even New Era and the NBA realize the Pistons' logo looks pretty close to a basketball You can't possibly say "Why is every team depicting a piston for their draft hat?"

The Florida State League unveiled a new logo that's a tremendous upgrade from the original: New: Old:

What DC doesn't need is another red white & blue team. I'm not sure it's the XFL's DC team's responsibility to resonate with Americans across the country and be America's team. It's DC's team.

That might be the worst rebrand in MiLB. All of the logos are junk.

Intentional?