charger77

The people that had their intellectual property stolen. And the people with no concept of right or wrong. Do you seriously think that anyone who has ever worn a piece of counterfeit merchandise has "no concept of right or wrong?" Do you realize how broad of a brush you're painting with there? The number of people who have worn counterfeit merchandise is a lot higher than you think it is. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if you, yourself, have worn counterfeit merchandise. I'd hate to know what you think of people who actually commit crimes. Dude, I'm talking about you, Mr. Defend Everyone From IP Thieves to Pedophiles. Oh, ok. So it's ok for you to commit crimes, but no one else. Ok, LightsOut. What crime has he been charged for or admitted to? Paying attention isn't exactly your strong suit, is it? Perhaps (Hell who am I kidding what that perhaps) that squiggily thing at the end of my sentence confused you. A ? is known as a question mark which indicates that an interrogative sentence has occurred. It was a question. If you have the answer to this query please provide it, if not just go back to defending counterfeiters and child predators.

The people that had their intellectual property stolen. And the people with no concept of right or wrong. Do you seriously think that anyone who has ever worn a piece of counterfeit merchandise has "no concept of right or wrong?" Do you realize how broad of a brush you're painting with there? The number of people who have worn counterfeit merchandise is a lot higher than you think it is. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if you, yourself, have worn counterfeit merchandise. I'd hate to know what you think of people who actually commit crimes. Dude, I'm talking about you, Mr. Defend Everyone From IP Thieves to Pedophiles. Oh, ok. So it's ok for you to commit crimes, but no one else. Ok, LightsOut. What crime has he been charged for or admitted to?

Laws of Economics? Lets see what the Constitution says: Article I Section VIII (The 7th Enumerated power of Congress) Who cares if it violates economic "law" it violates the law of the country.

The people that had their intellectual property stolen.

Something about the back of the jersey doesn't look right to me. This may help.

I was a fan of those too.

That opinion is not all that unpopular.

Aebischer and Denis were Avalanche draft picks iirc BTW more Giguere

and wearing 10.

Hell, Gibson in a Diamondbacks jersey

Agreed, I just there that out as to a guess of why it may be wrong.

Probably because it is not what we are traditionally used to?

I love the thick black outline on that Flyers Jagr jersey!

$20? I wanted a peanut!

just saw it. WTF?

I just got a friend request from a guy called the_fan. He has zero posts, whats that all about?

Apparently sportsnet.ca knew about this thread.

Don Mattingly.

Wouldn't that be like the Bruins getting an Eastern Conference title ring, a Stanley Cup ring and a NHL Champions ring? lol

3 rings for 1 season? A conference ring and a National Title right seems like a bit of over kill. But a National Title and BCS ring?

How does once become a Packers shareholder?

I'm with you on this.

That is a pro athlete?

That would have been awesome. It's exactly what I thought was going to happen when the trade was made. The uni change had not been announced (or, at least, I did not know about it). Even if it had been for one year, I'd really consider getting the yellow home version. There is this gem too!