Silver_Star

Why so shock? I was not even focused on that aspect of Colorado. I never been there and want to go there. I only been to San Diego, Miami, Kansas City, Dallas, Japan, Tucson, and Phoenix, and I knew their traits. I had forgotten Colorado's because I never focused on that aspect.

Also to add on top on this, I like to see seal brown jerseys of this combo. It looks very nice. The all white is my favorite because they white uniforms have the orange shadow block similar to the 49ers 1955 uniforms. I like to see this version of the seal brown with white block numbers. If they did a false default, they could bring in brown pants with this combo with just the orange/white/orange stripe with the white helmet and BOOM, Cleveland would look great.

Ok, I guess you are right. Anaheim. I just do not like Anaheim because I had a bad experience there when I was in my early 20's visiting. I witnessed something bad and I got threatened, so yeah.

I had forgotten about that. Oh..... Well, this 5,280 stuff is great knowledge, but why put it on a jersey if it does not make sense to anything? Ehhhhhh, nope, sorry!

What does the 5280 suppose to me to them?

So that means the Angels went back to their roots, the Los Angeles Angels, it goes full circle!

Sure, yes. But remember, they did start out in Los Angeles for that 5-year stint. So, I am going to go by that. It's different with the NFL Chargers because they only stayed a year there and no one in L.A. wanted them (reasons why they moved to San Diego which was fitting for them big time).

Here is what I am going to say. They started out in Los Angeles, right? So why call them Anaheim when they were not there that long. They were only there because they had a new stadium out there. I do not care what you say to me, but in my eyes, they are STILL the Los Angeles Angels in the American League int he MLB.

I sound reverse from the Cleveland Browns having white helmets, but honestly it works for Cleveland because they have a darker jerseys like seal brown. Denver Broncos however, NO!!! If they go back to academy blue as an accent color and use white helmets to make the orange look good, NOPE!!! NO!!! Hell to the no!!! White helmets do not look great with the default color being orange and the accent color being academy blue. Sure, it works with Tampa Bay because the red was the darker color to the orange juice orange that Tampa Bay used. BUT, if they stay with navy blue, then it's already a god awful trainwreck of a uniform because the third color will be navy and then white helmets with navy jerseys and white pants will just be the Cowboys 1960-1963 fauxbacks all over again, but with orange as an accent color for the navy alts. Oh god, I can see it now.

Oh no. White helmets?!!! Oh no, not good!

The problem with the Angels exist with the Chargers in their debut in 1960 that only stayed one year in Los Angeles before moving to San Diego in 1961. Now with the Angels, Los Angeles Angels (2016–present) Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (2005–2015) Anaheim Angels (1997–2004) California Angels (1965–1996) Los Angeles Angels (1961–1965) I got that from Wiki. But this here is the main problem here!

Nice, but do you have red helmets and navy blue jersey version?

I am sorry for being such as wiseass, but this photo looks like Josh Allen is straining to hold his urine in.

I agree. But I think the Bills facemask should be white, but the blue does make the Bills helmet pop. The Falcons REALLY NEED red helmets instead of the Glanville black helmets. The BFBS Falcons look has gotten very old really fast. Red helmets and black jerseys would go well nicely.

Well folks, no more Stars, Generals, and Breakers! And the Maulers was good while it lasted. Oh well, we got this new league. I wish they use the AR on Arlington Renegades.

Things like this leaves you to wonder,

We will never get to see the proper 49ers helmet from that generation. 1946 graced both the Browns and 49ers.

Basically that is where the legging style came from in 2012. Came straight from the NBA. I wonder who suggested this to players and they started to utilize it a lot.

Not me!!! No way!!!

Ok, so what is a quality uniform to you? I already posted my feelings about the Rams new unis. They do need a hard reboot when it comes to looks. If they wanted a bone or alt uniform, why not harken back to the Fearsome Foursome as an alt uniform and the other alt being the 1950-1957 athletic gold jerseys. But just what is your idea of a quality uniform? Just your thoughts.

The orange helmets with that stripe pattern would go well with the orange helmets because then you can have a blue alt jersey for the orange helmets to be honest. I am not saying otherwise about the 1968-1996 blue helmets, but they never explored the orange helmets as much only in 1994 during the 75th season.

I understand, but I just saying. I am not discouraging anyone else. But to be very frank, I am not a fan of a few copycat styles to be honest. But ok, if they went back to the academy blue color, then it would work, otherwise it is just the stripe templates that are sort of close and similar with just a different color with Tampa being red and Syracuse being navy blue. I just don't see Denver wearing white helmet.

Well that works for them. And even with their orange jerseys, they do have orange helmets. But to me the white lids and orange helmets would always make me identify them as Tampa Bay Buccaneers, University of Tennessee Volunteers, University of Texas Longhorns, Oklahoma State University Cowboys, among others who wear white helmets and orange jerseys paired with white pants.

Anyone who disliked my comment can see the similarities to these two uniforms. The white pants do not make this uniform unique at all. Here, take a look Only difference is that they throwbacks do not use the same orange, but design wise it is TOO SIMILAR TO EACH OTHER! A no go for me if Denver decides to do the Syracuse style.