pianoknight Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 Not mine, but a pretty cool idea. Props to whomever created it - I saw this posted on Reddit/Imgur, which is not exactly known for properly citing sources and authors. 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sport Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 Pretty cool.The Browns timeline should have empty spaces for 96, 97, 98. According to the NFL's doctored history they weren't a team those three years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 I can't believe the Vikings logo looked like that for the first five years. It looks so stretched out. Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 I can't believe the Vikings logo looked like that for the first five years. It looks so stretched out.That's because it's wrong. As are many of the Packers logos.A lot of the early logos (from before style sheets) are scanned from old programs or other items, poorly reproduced, squished and stretched. Not necessarily reflecting what the teams actually used.Check out this media guide from their first season:That's a single-color version, to be sure, but the proportions are correct. I have no idea where that squished one came from, but it's not real. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 There's a LOT missing from that graphic. Pretty poor effort. I'm sure I've seen one of those posted here that's more accurate. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 In fairness, some of the inaccurate and plain-wrong logos come right off the mothership. Including that bad Vikings logo. http://www.sportslogos.net/logos/list_by_team/172/Minnesota_Vikings/ The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.