TBGKon Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 Thses are the semi-new USF Bulls unis. The reason I say semi-new is because they are essentially the same as last years unis (made by SportsBell or something like that) and now are Nike. One major difference is the nameplate on the back. Compare to the nameplate on last years uni:I am mainly posting this to show another example of a good set of Nike unis, what do you all think of them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Survival79 Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 Here's the rest of the gallery. Hopefully they fixed the helmet. "If things have gone wrong, I'm talking to myself, and you've got a wet towel wrapped around your head." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 heh, the sleeve numbers look a tad thin, don't you think? A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawlmerOreos Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 Here's the rest of the gallery. Hopefully they fixed the helmet. Seriously...the black logo decision was dumb. Especially when it copies the color scheme of your arch-rival (UCF.) Frank Creative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 I like the look of solid colored pants with a logo at the hip. These look good, SU's "SJ" pants looked good, FSU looks good, and I think the Baltimore Ravens do it too. My favorite of all time were the short-lived all-black New Orleans Saints pants before they went back to the striped gold pants. Does this unvieling mean than USF will stop going all-green? I never liked that look on any college team, and I think the green over white looks pretty good. 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 I like the look of solid colored pants with a logo at the hip. These look good, SU's "SJ" pants looked good, FSU looks good, and I think the Baltimore Ravens do it too. My favorite of all time were the short-lived all-black New Orleans Saints pants before they went back to the striped gold pants. Does this unvieling mean than USF will stop going all-green? I never liked that look on any college team, and I think the green over white looks pretty good. ...until they put those gold shells on. Then we'll have a good bit of a mismatch on our hands. Unless they got new white shells for this year. That would look good.South Florida has the potential to have a great branding package...I just haven't seen all the elements come together just yet. (I especially like the bullhorned "u".) I mean--I do like this look, but (and I can't put a finger on it yet) it seems lacking. But eh...oh well......Let's see how these look on the field with pads and shells, then I'll get back to this... *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 these look pretty decent, nothing to complain about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nugent4president Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 Is it just me, or isn't the Swoosh* supposed to be on the left hip and not the right?*Swoosh is a registered trademark of Nike Corp. Permission to use this word has been approved by written consent from Phil Knight, Nike Corp and the University of Oregon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.