WSU151

Found this mockup too on reddit (from 2022, so nothing confirmed - it even has the diamond swoosh so it's clearly photoshopped)..it looks good except for the number font, which I think is the Cavs' old font. The heavy base serif just doesn't work.

For HWC...I have a weird feeling the Nuggets are on there... I don't think they've had a HWC jersey in the Nike era yet. 30 years since 93/94 8th seed miracle, 15 years since 2008/09 WCF. The navy 90s look seems ripe for a HWC. Speaking of 93/94, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Rockets' 90s red jerseys yet again for HWC even though they just wore them in 19/20.

More blue rather than less blue better differentiates the two.

I think these would be just fine with out the gradient number on the back of the whites and grays. Would be cool if the batterman were light green and light blue.

A silver helmet with black stripes, a black jersey, and silver pants with a black stripe? The Raiders would have won that lawsuit.

This is still the expectation for the Sun, correct? _______________ I'm going with the same gut feeling that I've had the last 15 years - that the Mavs will get new unis. So they're probably not one of the teams.

With NFL teams in Miami and Tampa, I think Jacksonville will get an NFL team before Orlando. #postsfrom1991

Yep, here’s the confirmation of the hat and jersey in 2018 https://www.mlb.com/cut4/tampa-bay-rays-to-bring-back-1990s-devil-rays-uniforms-for-2018-season-c26602307

The Cowboys uniform has nothing that says “Cowboys”. The star is for Texas. With the Arizona flag on the unis in late 80s/00s, a new design with the flag is not totally off base.

The only that was awful about the WFT identity (other than the generic name) was the stripeless helmet with the numbers.

What’s more odd is the numbers on the back are still purple, which really clashes with the navy hats. The gradient still looks cool though and perfect for Tampa.

That’s the left sleeve you’re looking at, from behind.

Unpopular opinion maybe - Brewers should be wearing royal blue instead of navy. The BiG logo just looks way better on a royal hat.

The jerseys have had it for some time, but the Panthers’ logo looks so much better with the black outline.

If you’re asking because you haven’t seen anything, then I think you already know the answer. Leaks usually lead to five pages of posts.

Why are you glad to see that?

That would require league-wide approval. And if it could be done, the first team to get it would probably be the Cowboys.

Highly doubt it. The difference is really minute.

What's weird is this graphic, taken from the Carolina Panthers website, makes it look like the actual color in the logo is a different shade altogether and the non-matching background is process blue: If the color in the team logo is actually process blue, the "outline" should seamlessly disappear, but it doesn't on the team's webpage. In the new Riot Report graphic, it does just that.

I don’t think we can definitively say these two looks will be reduced.

100% chance but no leaks yet

Broncos’ website says the alt helmets (which seem to be white) will be worn with the color rush unis (remember NFL rules, for now, don’t let teams wear alternate helmets with main sets). So it’ll be weird if they wear white helmets with all orange (or all navy) uniforms.

This sucks ass. Was really hoping for throwback unis. Jumping on the icy white trend is just picking low hanging fruit. I’m guessing they wanted to get one more year out of the color rush set (which is quasi-throwback) before the change in 2024 (presumably).

Fair point. Though in 2002-04 (when the alts were showing up in 2k) the Cardinals only had white pants with red stripes and vice versa…so it would have been a white helmet with no blue and pants with no blue. I think the 98-99 Puma set might have had more blue accents.

It would have looked so out of place with the helmet and the pants.