Jump to content

DCarp1231

Members
  • Posts

    9,214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    131

Everything posted by DCarp1231

  1. Also, is the Notifications Tab one of the “bugs” because it seems to be nonexistent
  2. No worries! Just curious considering the change happened within an hour of me checking the site twice
  3. I’m assuming there’s a weird site wide update and that’s why things look a bit wonky?
  4. 100% agree. Especially with colored socks. However, if a team chooses to wear plain white socks, it really drags down the look. They’re still very likable uniforms, but it makes them feel incomplete.
  5. Even if I chose to report it, is it really going to do anything besides just replace it with a different, more annoying, ad?
  6. No one really likes the mono look. Like you said though, Seattle made that the team’s shtick and unfortunately it does work. For the road grey, it makes a lot of sense. Of all teams, the Rams proved a team doesn’t actually need a white away jersey. Grey is a good one for Seattle to adopt and drop the white uniform completely. I hope some more teams follow suit.
  7. If Seattle intends on never changing their uniforms, they need to simplify, roll with this and call it a day-
  8. A ginormous ad for vodka has been prevalent on mobile for the past week and takes up half the screen. Occasionally blocks the text box, but mainly blocks the notification sidebar. EDIT: Well, there’s this for proof
  9. Would anybody be willing to undertake a What if... project? An MLB landscape where all teams west of Milwaukee played in Portland at some point in their existence and all teams east of Cincinnati played in Montreal at some point during their existence. Also, because Wrigley Field and Guaranteed Rate Field are so N-S linear with each other on the team divide, they’ve both played in both cities at one point in their existence
  10. Even their original helmet is a bit wonky
  11. I also never said anything about the ball being a good idea
  12. You could also argue the attempt at a jet ruins it
  13. The thing is, the Jets can still accomplish a throwback uniform However, at the same time, the current helmet was a great way to blend two eras together. The above 80s-90s look plus the “classic” look It fits well within the current identity and a jet doesn’t have to be on the helmet. Much like the prior set.
  14. That’s the thing. It’s so simple it’s perfect. Plus, wordmark/script helmet logos are hardly ever done at the pro level anyway. I’ll take this over the standard “ny” any day- A few beauties from the college level-
  15. Conversely, the all black is probably my favorite of the set and I wish they treated it like a regular one and used it’s elements interchangeably. I wouldn’t mind seeing black socks with the regular green over white or green socks with the black jersey and pants or the black jersey over white pants and black socks. I firmly believe this and Cincinnati are 1A and 1B on NFL helmet rankings.
  16. I loathe the Yankees, but an outfielder wearing 77 in pinstripes looks really good For context, 77 is Clint Frazier. He originally wore 30, but switched to his current number once David Robertson was on the roster
  17. The new Jets set is better in every way and I’m prepared to die on that hill
  18. Are we positive this isn’t Teal?
  19. justatoddlerspants, because obviously they’re full of :censored:
  20. One will probably have Carter II on his jersey and the other Carter on his
  21. This implies that red pants were already in the works
  22. Apparently this is a very unpopular opinion, but in a league that has the Steelers, Packers, Chargers, and Rams using “athletic gold” or similar pants, it’s refreshing to see Washington in this- Compared to this-
  23. In terms of red numbers on dark jerseys, I prefer the Texans CR over Arizona’s
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.