chcarlson23

DON'T FORGET THE ST. PAUL SAINTS HAT!!!!

Don't know/think that this means Notre Dame is moving in any other sport, but they're moving to the Big Ten hockey conference next year. I think it'll add a little more talent for next year. My top 3 teams next year are Michigan, Minnesota, and Notre Dame. No one else is really a threat.

There are some fakes that I can believe people can and will buy. Like when the font is just a little bit off, or the collar detail is a little messed up, or the colors aren't QUITE right. (Not anyone on these boards, or course ) but then there's some that just baffle my mind! Like a Wild game I went to recently where some guy had the current white jersey with this completely distorted logo. It was extra wide and very short. It was barely recognizeable as a Wild jersey. I'm going to guess that he was sitting there, wearing a wild hat with the right logo on it, looked at the jersey and was like "Yep! It's perfect!" It wasn't like only people here wouldn't get it, it was NOTHING close to the WIld logo...

Did the number of games expand when the Wild and Blue Jackets came into the league? Or when some of the earlier expansion teams came in? Like ATL/WPG or NSH? Because then it might go up with the supposed addition of Las Vegas or Quebec...

It becomes a playoff issue. Especially when the playoffs are formated by division. Then the number of games has to be reworked to get all 82 games against every opponent at home and on the road, not to mention, one division will have an extra team meaning a playoff spot is even harder to get...

Not to be that guy, but the roundel is on the road sweater. It's the shoulder patch.

The original red jersey was great, to contrast against the Green and White Sweaters, but the piping and lack of tail stripe have really killed it. The green alt, does not have enough red, but is still better than the current home. The Main logo is definitely the best, but the script logo is still good. It's a modern rendering of script logos found on REALLY old sweaters.

Maybe that just is their identity. "The Vancouver Identity Confusions!!!!"

I get the hate for that sweater, but it was a wacky idea, that kinda worked...

I guess, but I'll always associate him with the Leafs. I barely saw him play in Calgary. I don't know what it is... It's definitely the wrong uniform to see him in, but it really fits him...

I don't know what it is, but that uniform looks ok for Phanuef. It's weird to see him in it, but it fits him. Better than the leafs...

Ok, here goes. I think that the Current Anaheim Ducks branding is better than the Mighty Ducks. (Yes, the current includes the Mighty Ducks logo recolored.) The Webbed-foot D logo is better than the Mighty Ducks logo. It's ingenious. The shape of a ducks foot makes the letter D... It's better than a Duck goalie mask with hockey Sticks behind it. (But don't get me wrong the MIghty Ducks logo is still a decent logo.) This one may not be as unpopular, but I prefer the 1967 leaf to the current new Logo of the Maple Leafs. While the new logo is better than the Ballard logo, the 1967 leaf is the best they've ever had...

Regardless of whatever he said about John Scott, Milbury needed to go...

I used to think that all hard hitting players or goons were defensemen when I was younger. I was real surprised to find out that people like Matt Cooke and Clutterbuck were both forwards...

I agree. It's just that their current home and away sweaters, (If you can call them that ) are awful.

Kyle Brodziak on the Blues This is SOOO wrong!!!

What a stellar looking game that must've been to watch live. I don't have any memory of that one. If I didn't know any better, and from a distance, that matchup would look like the Browns vs the Roughriders. (Yes, the CFL team.)

I see your Hossa and raise you a Chris Chelios I raise to you an Oilers Plante Bruins Plante Blues Plante

The Cowboys are too white... They need either blue socks, which breaks the rules of monochrome, or at least a blue stripe on them.

Can't get any screen shots, but NHL 2K5 leaves the "current" (2004) Font on any throwback uniforms. I.e. The Sharks currents at the time were the blue and silver shoulder fill ins, but when you did the original throw backs, you got the font on sweater. It was the same with the Kings. (Gretzky era throwbacks with current font, looked a lot like today's uniforms) Every NHL uniform was also pretty historically accurate, you could even be the Oakland Seals, who moved to CLE, merged with MIN, and moved to DAL. But you can't play as the Whalers. They don't even exist in the game. You can't play as the St. Louis Eagles, but you can buy the logo to put on a custom fantasy team, but not the Whalers. You can play as the huge hockey communities of France and Kazakstan, but not the Whalers. (Catching on?)

Except that was used in one logo. on the pants and shoulders for three years. Now that black and blue alt was amazing! It definitely should have been there color scheme.

For some reason that jersey almost fits him as perfectly as a Ducks one...

Is that sharpie on the back of his jersey???

Same with Corey Perry. Rick Nash is that you?

Mothership says the Lakers switched to purple and gold in '66, Kings started play in '67. I heard that the owner of the Kings owned the Lakers too, so he made them match colors, and technically it was Fourm Blue & Gold! Get it right!