MCM0313

Mine is 31, and he’s been with me since I was 18 and he was 9.

The new one wasn’t even more realistic, unless actual Rams have notches that lead to segments of different shades of yellow.

DUDE, sorry to change the subject, but just noticed the African Grey with you and your son in the profile pic. I have a Grey too!

Haha, @jamesizzo, the page forcibly reloads itself a lot, sometimes losing the message I’m composing in the process. It reloaded as I was typing the word “set” this time. I don’t think I hit the post button, but sometimes the box does jump around the screen.

For me it’s just kind of about nobody wanting to claim Columbia blue. I would be fine with the Titans doing what they did for part of the Fisher era and going with Columbia blue for their main color and navy for their secondary.

As far as the Texans’ new set goes, I would gladly take the gaudy H-Town Blue set with red socks over their regular home set with white pants and white socks (both of which they have modeled, so it isn’t just a hypothetical).

As far as the Texans’ new s

It will get stale very quickly, and they will modernize the Orange Crush throwbacks for full-time use in either 2029 or 2030.

Bengals fan but wholeheartedly agree. The matchups between our teams should look really good.

Right - it's football, not yoga.

1. So, with individual colors not being trademarked, could the Texans have told the Titans to screw off and used 279? Or does Tennessee have leaguewide rights to that color? Or would there be some kind of infringement based on being in the same division? Related: 2. I remember reading long ago (like, a decade or more) that the league allowed each team to have one color that was unique to them; other colors they had to share. Is that still the case? Because, honestly, it looks like most teams don’t have a unique color of their own anymore. I mean, what - Dolphins’ aqua, Panthers’ electric blue, Eagles’ teal, the respective shades of purple worn by the Ravens and Vikings? Am I missing any? 3. What is the PMS code for the Broncos’ new royal blue that is used very sparingly? Related: 4. Why have you never included the actual color(s) of the Broncos’ pre-1997 helmets? I’m guessing it would just be an approximation? How close would it be to PMS 307 (Ole Miss’ robins’ egg blue)? (And, for that matter, how about the navy helmets worn at the same time by the Giants and Rams?) Please don’t take this onslaught of questions the wrong way - I am incredibly thankful for all that you do. Your site is wonderful.

Glad I’m not the only one who immediately thought of them upon seeing that number.

Wait…285? That’s the Chargers’ shade. Ha!

Yeah, untucked undershirts should be an absolute non-starter, to the point that a player should be removed from the game until he tucks his shirt in. Don’t @ me.

I want more non-white socks.

That’s the safe option, and it usually looks fine. It’s not the only choice, though, and there have been lots of good looks (current Giants, 1997-2002 Falcons, Orange Crush Broncos) that used the secondary color for the number on the white jersey.

They never have been.

PLEASE DON’T GIVE THEM ANY IDEAS!

Apparently that’s the Bruno uniform (Bruniform?), because we don’t talk about it.

With the red socks and H-Town Blue shoes, I actually kind of like these. Without those splashes of color? Nah.

The uniforms of the pre-1997 Broncos and Dolphins, pre-2000 Rams, 1997-2002 Falcons, pre-2004 Bengals, and pre-2005 Cardinals are absolutely worth the use of a time machine.

1993 Patriots.

Yeah, but just looking at that picture, I really can’t tell what the elevation of the area is. At least the Broncos fixed that.

The triangles represent thin air, not the developers’ rectums. Well, the Titans have always had that right legally. They are the same franchise as the Oilers. The Texans are not. I’m glad the Titans are sticking in that lady’s craw.

As a one-off sure. And as somebody else posted earlier, I would gladly take this in exchange for no more plain white socks with their regular uniforms.