MCM0313
-
Posts
4,419 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by MCM0313
-
-
3 hours ago, Discrimihater said:
Yeah, a fine color scheme, just not for the Giants.
...or for anyone in MLB history, evidently. The current Mariners (navy and dark teal) are the closest we've ever come, aren't they?
-
10 hours ago, SFGiants58 said:
Judging by the "G" hat (worn by Toronto Chairman Paul Godfrey), I don't think the color change proposal would have stuck or was the only option:
The blue/green "TG" was either a later addition or rejected for a black/orange redesign. One has to remember that the Giants' brand had lost much of its cache by the mid-late 1970s, with the team struggling competitively in one of the worst stadiums in Big Four history. The 1976 (when the Toronto move was supposed to happen) team was a hapless bunch, like most Giants teams from the early-1970s to the late-1980s. Changing things up to match their new setting, while a bad idea from a historical POV, might have worked. This is especially the case for the Giants of the time, who would have lost many historical ties with relocation (e.g., rivalry with the Dodgers, being one of the first teams to move out west, etc.).
I can definitely see your point about wanting a new Toronto team to "fit in" with the other teams in the city, especially with the later possibility of throwback gear. I could also imagine the inverse, with nostalgia around the blue/green look and the modern team deciding to opt for the historically-significant black/orange (e.g., like what the White Sox have done with the "Winning Ugly " set).
I even mocked up a potential uniform, with cues from the inaugural Blue Jays:
I'm not keen on it, for personal, historical, and aesthetic reasons.
I'm not keen on it either, but darned if that isn't a fine color scheme.
- 3
-
1 hour ago, goalieboy82 said:
cant help to thing of this:
Dang it, you beat me to it. "I will not buy this tobacconist, IT is scratched!"
- 1
-
10 hours ago, AndrewMLind said:
Bell in a uniform he’ll never wear:
As interesting as that Photoshop is, it's still a Photoshop.
-
-
4 hours ago, fouhy12 said:
I like the Color Rush version myself. It's just bright enough, and the navy is a little too dark. I'd be totally cool with them going to that royal shade full-time except I feel like it wouldn't provide enough contrast with the powder blue, and I don't want them dropping the powder blue.
- 1
-
On 2/26/2019 at 5:05 PM, IceBurgs70 said:
Both teams look sharp here. A revamped full-body jag on the sleeve cap would do wonders for the Jaguars' current uniforms.
- 6
-
16 minutes ago, KRZYBDGRZ said:
I don’t think he has a wrong team, he left a tiny impact on all of them
I'd say the Rockets were his biggest impact. Not necessarily his biggest playing time, but actually having a specific role and doing it well to help the team win.
- 1
-
2 hours ago, IceBurgs70 said:
Have the Saints worn gold numerals on white jerseys against the Nike-fied Broncos any other time? I feel like probably not. I was surprised to see those as late as 1998.
- 1
-
On 2/15/2019 at 7:22 PM, AndrewMLind said:
I just read that it has to do with Steph Curry's shoes...I was thinking maybe their designer suffered from red-green colorblindness, given that their colors are red and black.
-
2 hours ago, AndrewMLind said:
I wouldn't consider the Houston Oilers/Tennessee Titans a bright-colored team. The shade of blue is more of a soft pastel, rather than neon, like the Carolina Panthers.
Yeah, I was gonna say something about that myself. I WOULD consider that uniform bright as opposed to dark, but it certainly isn't neon.
-
-
1 hour ago, BellaSpurs said:
Makes it seem like a 10 yr old designed them tho
Sometimes, sometimes not. Well-designed neons can look good.
- 5
-
-
1 hour ago, AndrewMLind said:
The entire Cleveland Cavaliers roster from 2008-2010 played with LeBron and his father, Delonte West.
The actual answer is: Moses Malone - Rick and Jon Barry; Bimbo Coles - Milt and Dajuan Wagner; and Ron Artest (Metta World Peace - Tim Hardaway Sr. and Jr. This is the first time it's been for the same franchise, though.
Bahaha, I'd forgotten about that whole thing. Been awhile.
-
37 minutes ago, DG_Now said:
Not that short. It at least includes everyone on the 1990 Seattle Mariners roster.
Right. I was thinking specifically within the NBA though. Smaller rosters, and it seems like not it's not as common there for a player to be the son of a former player.
- 1
-
On 1/31/2019 at 11:23 PM, anythinglogos said:
So Dirk has played alongside both father and son? That's gotta put him on a pretty short list, wouldn't you think?
- 4
-
-
-
Man, that didn't last long.
-
18 minutes ago, Echo said:
I think the biggest difference is that the 1980 set had TV numbers and the set that preceded them didn't. Also black facemasks. The older set had grey facemasks.
http://nflfootballjournal.blogspot.com/2016/10/cincinnati-bengals-last-team-to-add-tv.html
Okay, that's fair. It's interesting that in that picture they're playing against the team they would beat for the AFC championship the next season.
-
On 1/11/2019 at 9:57 AM, Davidellias said:
How different was that Bengals set from the one preceding it? Because it looks pretty similar. This could just be because it isn't as drastic a difference as the 1981 set made.
-
-
Unused Logos and Uniforms
in Sports Logo General Discussion
Posted
Were they using any blue at all by 2007? I seem to remember them as black and dark green.