Jump to content

MCM0313

Members
  • Posts

    4,368
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MCM0313

  1. 9 hours ago, Ray Lankford said:

    Speaking of the Steelers, I love the rounded numbers and think they look immensely better than the old block ones. 

    I hate the Steelers, but I also think they look better with their current number font than they did with the old one. Although the old one did give the whole set an old-time intimidation factor, calling to mind the Steel Curtain defense of the '70s.

  2. 51709826.jpg

     

    Not as rare as you might think- these sets coexisted for three years and were in the same division for two of those years, so they met at least four times. Still, Dirty Birds vs New Millennium Rams seems like a clash of two different eras, even as '90s stars Terrance Mathis and Aeneas Williams battle it out for a pass.

    • Like 1
  3. 1998-falcons-at-jets.jpgFalcons vs. Jets, 1998, in a battle of two of the NFL's best teams that year. 44-year-old QB Steve DeBerg is being sacked by the New York defense in a game the Jets won 28-3; his presence in the photo arguably makes it even rarer and more stark a contrast between old and new (although, the Jets' unis were based on throwbacks and the Falcons were in just the second year of those road uniforms, so ymmv).

    • Like 3
  4. The "Dirty Bird" Falcons have been mentioned here before (specifically against the Brady-era Pats IIRC), but there should be a lot for them. That specific look lasted from 1997-2002 (1990-96 had less red), in a time when uniform changes were happening left and right, and then the Falcons finally changed theirs too. I'll look into it later today, but there should be pics of them against the "look at how 2000 we look" Rams, the white-helmet Jets, the "angry" Dolphins, the McNair-era Titans, and possibly the "holy crap do we look terrible" Bills, and there may also be pics of them against the "ny" Giants, the spear Redskins, the bird-face Ravens, and/or the Pacific blue Seahawks. (What about the Millen-era Lions? Did they add black in or before 2002, or was it later? I don't recall right offhand.)

  5. 9 hours ago, MCM0313 said:

    It's pretty cool in a 1996 way. I really miss '90s sports fashion, aside from the BFBS boom at the end of the decade. Heck, I miss '90s fashion in general. I had the sweetest bowl cut from 1994-97. It legit looked good on me because I have thick hair and it was still kind of light brown/sandy-colored before darkening to the current shade of brown around my 13th birthday.

    Back on topic, here's an unpopular opinion: bowl cuts were cool! Of course that racist dickhead whose name shall not be mentioned had to ruin them for us...but here are some pics from back in the day, featuring yours truly:

     

    11029561_10102933698137334_1305161789447588446_n.jpg11021088_10102933738740964_5858477709476805905_n.jpg

    10845966_10102933729314854_4247162476524573652_n.jpg

    • Like 1
  6. 9 hours ago, Dolphins Dynasty said:

    It's not exactly on par with most of the logos in the MLS, but I still think this is a pretty solid logo.

     

    qtfoxrlfgs3gjvif4ao608tia.gif

    It's pretty cool in a 1996 way. I really miss '90s sports fashion, aside from the BFBS boom at the end of the decade. Heck, I miss '90s fashion in general. I had the sweetest bowl cut from 1994-97. It legit looked good on me because I have thick hair and it was still kind of light brown/sandy-colored before darkening to the current shade of brown around my 13th birthday.

  7. 4 hours ago, Rj0498 said:

    a bit of a hometown thing. I think these:

    https://nflseahawks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/091117favre450.jpg

    were not that bad. a bit dated sure but, not as terrible as say the bills 2000s rebrand or the cardinals rebrand

    Well, yeah. The Vikings can't look horrible as long as they wear purple and yellow and have the horn that wraps around their helmet. That was still a huge downgrade from the Cris Carter-era set, though.

    • Like 2
  8. 4 hours ago, Rj0498 said:

    http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/slides/photos/002/312/156/334191_crop_north.jpg?w=630&h=420&q=75

     

    in case you couldn't tell, I really like following themes. Here is good ole Andre Rison. sure, he went to a pro bowl his first year there but imo, I think he belongs more in a glanville era Falcons uni

    I'm not sure he has a *right* uniform. I would also go Falcons first, but he was also a high draft pick of the Colts, scored that memorable touchdown for the Packers early in Super Bowl XXXI, and had a stink-'em-up season with the Browns as well (and yes, I vaguely remember him on a really good Chiefs team that couldn't win a playoff game). I may yet be missing someone else he played for...am I?

  9. On 12/10/2016 at 11:34 AM, DNAsports said:

    I actually really like the Minnesota Wild identity. Easily the best "singular" named sports team beating out Miami Heat, Utah Jazz, Oklahoma City Thunder, Tampa Bay Lightning, Chicago Fire.

    I think the Wild look good too (at least they have a unique color scheme and own it!), but aren't you forgetting about the Magic?

  10. 18 hours ago, larrypep said:

     

    Hard to argue the iconic nature of the 1981 unis, they were cutting edge at the time they were unveiled.  That said, while I think the original uniforms were bland and definitely similar to the Cleveland Browns, I just dig that original helmet with that simple black font outlined in white.  "BENGALS".  I even bought a mini helmet of that version and I'm not even a Bengals fan. 

     

    But there's no turning back, the tiger stripe helmets are awesome and has withstood the test of time.  

    It's kind of cool how simple that helmet is, but also kind of lame once you realize the myriad design possibilities that the name "Bengals" gives you. One of the initial helmets Paul Brown was given to look at was similar to what the team adopted in '81; kinda sad he went so plain.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.