Sec19Row53

Yes, along with euthanizing concepts outside the concept forum.

Unless you were rained out yesterday, making then now. [insert Space Balls gif]

Because sometimes it's easier to pick out a short, concise statement in a post that makes me think WTF. "He will make the hall of fame on stats alone". Yep. This history of the game need not be changed by someone in order to be considered a hall of Famer.

Entirely different era, but still entirely based on stats.

I had Billy Williams in mind, but 'Let's Play Two' was a better answer.

As opposed to his philanthropic endeavors??

Yeah- I was more questioning him than you, but I thought maybe someone had heard something that could address it.

But it's last year's alternate that is theoretically being modified with a new mask. That helmet was blue with the old logo on it, not this helmet. Why would they need special dispensation to wear an orange facemask?? I don't think the Packers can change their alternate uniform yet, so I'm betting it will be a literal gold helmet with a single green stripe.

The Lions article just posted seems to say that last year's alt helmet will still be used with their new alt uniform.

No it doesn't. The Arizona Cardinals also have multiple pants options. White pants to wear with the white jersey; red pants to wear with the red jersey; and black pants to wear with the black jersey.

Has there ever been a criminal who held a press conference to declare his guilt? I'm not saying he's guilty, but this doesn't prove anything.

.

Sorry (not sorry) I've upset the Vet. Let me try to spell this out -- I use TV numbers when I watch football. Any time (almost) that someone claims that nobody uses them, or that nobody sees them in the stands, I'll point out that they are, in fact, used and seen. Are they "just to that important" [sic]? Maybe. Your facetious remark about the hologram reminds me of John Madden earnestly reminding everyone that the players can't see that first down line when it debuted. You know that, and you know that we wouldn't see it in the stands.

Well played

They're watching the game, often with binoculars. Their spotter is certainly watching it that way, and it's his job to provide the number of the tackler, among other things. Whether or not the feed is in real time is also subject to the various setups. From up in Row 53, I frequently use the tv numbers. To each his own.

Not from the stands we aren't, nor from the broadcast booth.

I don't think there's been a clear view that shows this. The 'game action' is an estimate of what they look like. I see red in the sleeve horn, and that would fit Nike's MO for how they handle the swoosh.

As pointed out upthread, I'm worried about two 'big' numbers on a jersey. They won't be perfectly posed like these are.

No such rule regarding a length of time.

Ty Montgomery began his career as a WR, and was allowed to keep that number.

50 yards. If the league is generating their own stats page, their coding should have set up the field to be the right length.

How long is an IFL field? What does the drive chart show?

They had them first. ETA - And no, that isn't it.

You're not wrong, but much of what we do here is pointless.

I 'tuned in' to the IFL site to see how Green Bay's opener went today. Do you notice anything brutally wrong with this picture??