Lee. Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 Discuss. Welcome to DrunjFlix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lopernv Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 Tats teh pimpin shizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthMan Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 UUUGGGLLLLYYY! "We have nothing to fear except fear itself." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 dig that neck...or is that hair...or another thunder bolt!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee. Posted November 2, 2004 Author Share Posted November 2, 2004 The truly frightening thing is that on the NIFL website, in the forums, the regulars are saying that it's a great logo...Yipe. Just yipe. Welcome to DrunjFlix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 Have you looked at the others?From a purely technical design standpoint, it's pretty solid. No inconsisticancies to speak of. The outlines are almost completely consistant. There are no fades. There are no out of place drop shadows.All that said, it's not the greatest piece of art. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 From a purely technical design standpoint, it's pretty solid. No inconsisticancies to speak of. The outlines are almost completely consistant. ...and yet, the glaring inconsistency of the outline of the lightning bolt 'horns' and the rest of the logo jumped out at me right away.Yipe indeed Lamicus, yipe indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilbert Posted November 3, 2004 Share Posted November 3, 2004 So are they the Vikings or the Thunderbolts? Signature intentionally left blank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampman Posted November 3, 2004 Share Posted November 3, 2004 It wouldn't be too bad if the face was more "human", but it's not my style... Comic Sans walks into a bar, and the bartender says, "Sorry, we don't serve your type here." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted November 3, 2004 Share Posted November 3, 2004 From a purely technical design standpoint, it's pretty solid. No inconsisticancies to speak of. The outlines are almost completely consistant. ...and yet, the glaring inconsistency of the outline of the lightning bolt 'horns' and the rest of the logo jumped out at me right away.Yipe indeed Lamicus, yipe indeed. I do agree with that, it stood out to me, I just think all things considered, it's minor. Considering how much better this is from a technical stand point then most in that league...well...I don't know... JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesCraven Posted November 3, 2004 Share Posted November 3, 2004 The logo is actually that to resemble Thor, the Viking God of thunder. BTW, IMHO it does not B, B, S and/or S at the same time. "I better go take a long walk off a short pier or something."Some people on this bolard have told me to do just that.My "Ron Mexico" alias is "Jon Tobago". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted November 3, 2004 Share Posted November 3, 2004 I'll grant that the majority of the NIFL's member teams have hideous logos. Even taking that into consideration, I don't know that the Lakeland Thunderbolts' logo qualifies as being "much better" from a technical stand-point than most logos in the league.IMHO, Billings, Black Hills, Dayton, Carolina, Everett and Lexington all have logos that are vastly superior to Lakeland's in terms of the quality of design and execution. Fort Wayne, Omaha, Tupelo, Wyoming, Evansville and Sioux City have logos/identities that leave a bit to be desired, but - that said - the logos are still fairly well-rendered from a design stand-point. Sioux Falls and Tri-City fall into the "meh" category. As for Atlantic City, Beaumont, Houma Bay, Lake Charles, Lincoln, New Jersey, Ohio Valley, Show Me, Tri-Cities, Utah and Lakeland... I think that they're all miserable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted November 3, 2004 Share Posted November 3, 2004 Evansville? The Bluecats? I don't speak for democrats, democrats don't speak for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.