LEWJ Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 The Bucks went with something like this? | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranium Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 That'd be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sp0rtsguy13 Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 I think its just a little too funky. Too many different shades of green, How many pro teams have used just shades of one color before(excluding white)? Stanley Cups 1980,1981,1982,1983World Series Titles 1955,1959,1963,1965,1981,1988 Super Bowl Titles VI,XII,XXVII,XXVIII,XXXSuper Bowl Title III Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthMan Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 Maybe a silver accent to replace the green accent "We have nothing to fear except fear itself." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 Is he missing eye's for a reason? But still good colors. It must be a Zombie buck I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief. Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 It's better than the mess they have now. I like it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OB33 Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 Now that's a buck that would scare some people.Nice work. #CHOMPCHOMPCHOMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 I had heard on here a week or two ago that the Bucks were thinking about changing things up within the next couple years. As for the concept, I like it. The Bucks should never have added purple and just kept the green on green look. But when the Bucks do make the change, I would like to see them go back to using this bad boy, as their primary logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.