goforbroke Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 Not really much of a concept I admit, but what would you guys say if the Jays started using one or both of these an alt logo or a patch? I just isolated the head from the old alt, and fixed the eyebrow a little so it looked a tad less feminine.And in the current shade of blue:I think its a cool looking logo and such a waste to see them ditch it completely. Its could be like their version of the cartoon oriole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldogbarks55 Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 Not really much of a concept I admit, but what would you guys say if the Jays started using one or both of these an alt logo or a patch? I just isolated the head from the old alt, and fixed the eyebrow a little so it looked a tad less feminine.And in the current shade of blue:I think its a cool looking logo and such a waste to see them ditch it completely. Its could be like their version of the cartoon oriole.Well, if this doesn't "fly" you could always bring back BJ Birdie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 I like this, with the leaf, but without it, I think it's really missing something.... like maybe a 'roid filled arm with a leaf tattooed on it. Really likin the lighter blue, with the leaf though. | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted June 22, 2008 Author Share Posted June 22, 2008 I like this, with the leaf, but without it, I think it's really missing something.... like maybe a 'roid filled arm with a leaf tattooed on it. Really likin the lighter blue, with the leaf though.I hope you're not implying that I'm trying to pass this off as my own concept. I said straight out all I did was grab the head fromthe old alt. I just think its worth discussing if the Jays should ignor this alltogether or maybe they can still make it work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Cunningham Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 I like this, with the leaf, but without it, I think it's really missing something.... like maybe a 'roid filled arm with a leaf tattooed on it. Really likin the lighter blue, with the leaf though.I hope you're not implying that I'm trying to pass this off as my own concept. I said straight out all I did was grab the head fromthe old alt. I just think its worth discussing if the Jays should ignor this alltogether or maybe they can still make it work.I don't think he's implying that at all. I believe that was LEWJ's cheeky way of saying that this logo may not fly in the post-steroid-shakedown majors because admittedly, the bird's arm is huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiK Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 maybe ditch the red on the leaf and use the silver? maybe? 73, 77, 81, 83, 90, 06 29, 30, 31, 36, 39, 44, 61, 62, 65, 66, 67, 96, 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 I like this, with the leaf, but without it, I think it's really missing something.... like maybe a 'roid filled arm with a leaf tattooed on it. Really likin the lighter blue, with the leaf though.I hope you're not implying that I'm trying to pass this off as my own concept. I said straight out all I did was grab the head fromthe old alt. I just think its worth discussing if the Jays should ignor this alltogether or maybe they can still make it work.I wasn't trying to say that at all.I'm just trying to say that without anything next to it (leaf or muscle filled arm), the head alone looks terribly plain.In other words, with the leaf behind the head, I think it would work great on a cap.Sorry about that man. | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted June 22, 2008 Author Share Posted June 22, 2008 Oh ok... sorry for the accusing you of accusing me lol. Yeah I just think Its a cool looking logo and shouldn't be forgotten. I think with some tweaks (I'm really not a pro designer) it can work. I think its a better looking Jay than the one they use now at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mania Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 I really don't know how the eye makes it look less feminine, if anything, it has the opposite effect. That is definitely a female blue jay. Off The Top Rope: A Pro Wrestling Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eye Posted June 23, 2008 Share Posted June 23, 2008 I really don't know how the eye makes it look less feminine, if anything, it has the opposite effect. That is definitely a female blue jay.Perhaps it is a female blue jay; after a while (I got the home version of this cap in 2003) it looked to me as if the blue jay was wearing lipstick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh_cat_eyes Posted June 23, 2008 Share Posted June 23, 2008 Braden did a concept using the odd shaped T and this bird guy that I really liked. This one I like aswell. The leaf looks quite plain though. Perhaps try adding some highlights to it or make it darker or something. I just doesn't seem like it fits with the bird logo. Great start though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spezza19 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 It looks like something you would see in a Chinese cartoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.