BrandMooreArt Posted September 2, 2009 Author Share Posted September 2, 2009 i can't believe no one caught this but its GSH not GHS, hope that helpsi have to say, i am embarrassed. i usually never make mistakes like that. ill change it right awaythanks to all for the other recent replys. i will consider them all. too busy to post updates now, but i will when i can.PS... i have a UCF football, and Houston Texans concept that is nearly wrapped up which i will also post ASAP GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Team and/or city names appearing on helmet logos screams arena/minor league IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted September 3, 2009 Author Share Posted September 3, 2009 Team and/or city names appearing on helmet logos screams arena/minor league IMO.even with the Steelers? Jets? Raiders? GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Boy Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 The Redskins' red jersey/yellow pants combo is a winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 At least you did not try to rename them because a few white politicians feel that it's a "racist" name. I can't stand concepts that rename them...it's a name that should stay and is in no way offensive. (I can say this, I have some Cherokee in me!)Then you'd better let him out!"Redskins" is a racist name, but we're stuck with it. It's been here too long and the brand's too strong, so even if it's wrong, you just have to go along. I like the suggestions to replace the rather artless Indian head with a potato. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 At least you did not try to rename them because a few white politicians feel that it's a "racist" name. I can't stand concepts that rename them...it's a name that should stay and is in no way offensive. (I can say this, I have some Cherokee in me!)Then you'd better let him out!"Redskins" is a racist name, but we're stuck with it. It's been here too long and the brand's too strong, so even if it's wrong, you just have to go along. I like the suggestions to replace the rather artless Indian head with a potato.I don't view it as racist and the majority of actual Native Americans don't either, or simply don't care. Like I said, most of the uproar has been fabricated by white politicians and special interests groups. A lot of NAs are actually honored to have all of the "Indian"-themed teams (except maybe Cleveland's Chief Wahoo).To change the name would be to throw away a ton of tradition and history, football-wise.It's not a change that needs to be, or should be made, especially by court-ordered force, which has thankfully failed in each pathetic attempt.If you're offended by it, don't buy their merchandise or root for them. Maybe I could say I am offended by teams like the Lakers and Jazz that have team names that don't reflect their local history. Heck, the Canucks and Canadiens offend me too! See how easy it can get out of hand if we start trying NOT to offend EVERYONE...we're end up offending everyone in the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aci Posted September 9, 2009 Share Posted September 9, 2009 The Redskins name is pretty offensive... Chief Wahoo is stupid and cartoonish, but the word 'redskin' is a racial slur. Braves, Indians, Seminoles, Fighting Sioux, Chiefs- all those names are good in my books, but I draw the line at 'Redskins'. Hamilton Eagles- 2012 and 2013 Continental Hockey League Champions! 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 & 2015 CHL East Division Champions! Niagara Dragoons- 2012 United League and CCSLC World Series Champions! 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 UL Robinson Division Champions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted September 9, 2009 Share Posted September 9, 2009 The Redskins name is pretty offensive... Chief Wahoo is stupid and cartoonish, but the word 'redskin' is a racial slur. Braves, Indians, Seminoles, Fighting Sioux, Chiefs- all those names are good in my books, but I draw the line at 'Redskins'.It can be called "racial", but I don't think "racist" fits.Let's continue the game...my parents were born in the south, so Yankees is offensive to me.Ragin' Cajuns and all of the teams called the Rebels or Runnin' Rebels are mocking me.Brewers offends recovering alcoholics.Mets excludes rural fans.Wizards...the Bible says to avoid witchcraft.Browns...yeah, that's as racist sounding as the Fighting Whities!Don't even ask about the Gamecocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapitalsFanInMD Posted September 9, 2009 Share Posted September 9, 2009 sorry ebonin, but i took the feathers off, LOL. heres my updates to the 'Skins also featuring stripes on the helmet. this feels more redskins to me nowThe design looks very nice. No changes necessary. LEONARD WEIRICHSILVER SPRING MD USAGO CAPS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajmccall Posted September 9, 2009 Share Posted September 9, 2009 The Redskins name is pretty offensive... Chief Wahoo is stupid and cartoonish, but the word 'redskin' is a racial slur. Braves, Indians, Seminoles, Fighting Sioux, Chiefs- all those names are good in my books, but I draw the line at 'Redskins'.It can be called "racial", but I don't think "racist" fits.Let's continue the game...my parents were born in the south, so Yankees is offensive to me.Ragin' Cajuns and all of the teams called the Rebels or Runnin' Rebels are mocking me.Brewers offends recovering alcoholics.Mets excludes rural fans.Wizards...the Bible says to avoid witchcraft.Browns...yeah, that's as racist sounding as the Fighting Whities!Don't even ask about the Gamecocks.Yeah but none of those groups you just announced were raped by this country quite like the Native Americans. The fact that its the team of our Nation's capital is pretty bad. "Indians' would be better than "Redskins"Hell, injuns would probably be an improvement. Store 1 Store 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEANS Posted September 10, 2009 Share Posted September 10, 2009 The name redskins has been controversial for many years. The name largely became a derogatory term for native americans. However it was never intended that way. The name has various origins, but largely comes from the red paint the Native Americans would paint on their faces before battle. Red is the color of War.When the team moved to Fenway park while they were the Boston Braves, they renamed the team the Redskins in recognition of their first coach William "Lone Star" Dietz who's mother was Sioux. "Lone Star" also brought many native americans to the team from his previous coaching gig which was at the Haskel Indian School. https://www.andrewsterlachini.com/ or http://dribbble.com/MEANS1974 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted September 10, 2009 Share Posted September 10, 2009 The Redskins name is pretty offensive... Chief Wahoo is stupid and cartoonish, but the word 'redskin' is a racial slur. Braves, Indians, Seminoles, Fighting Sioux, Chiefs- all those names are good in my books, but I draw the line at 'Redskins'.It can be called "racial", but I don't think "racist" fits.Let's continue the game...my parents were born in the south, so Yankees is offensive to me.Ragin' Cajuns and all of the teams called the Rebels or Runnin' Rebels are mocking me.Brewers offends recovering alcoholics.Mets excludes rural fans.Wizards...the Bible says to avoid witchcraft.Browns...yeah, that's as racist sounding as the Fighting Whities!Don't even ask about the Gamecocks.Yeah but none of those groups you just announced were raped by this country quite like the Native Americans. The fact that its the team of our Nation's capital is pretty bad. "Indians' would be better than "Redskins"Hell, injuns would probably be an improvement.I do not support reparations for ANY group whose current members were NOT directly affected by past history.I had done an extensive research paper on the topic many years ago in school...the FAR majority of Native Americans are not only unoffended by the team names (including the Redskins), those who have a position on the issue are actually more honored than offended.Like I said, it's mainly white politicians and lawyers looking to make headlines and feel important who have fabricated this "controversy". The Redskins have won numerous court cases and the issue needs to be buried. Even recantly:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/177556-washington-redskins-win-in-court-too-keep-nameI am more offended by the lyrics and use of a certain "n" word in rap than the Redskins name, and like I said, I have actual Native American in my background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.