cjzilligen Posted July 26, 2010 Posted July 26, 2010 Not only is dropping teal from the color scheme bad, but the placement of the advertisements just kills the whole look. The NFL must be in some deep :censored: if the ads are made to be that huge. Dribbble | Twitter | Facebook | Portfolio
dfwabel Posted July 26, 2010 Posted July 26, 2010 You brought zero method to your sponsor madness. InBev owns the theme parks which were sold in the Anheuser-Busch takeover, but why would the the NFL allow separate sponsor not even when UEFA allows for various brands from one company to be branded. Plus, Sea World is closer to Tampa than Miami.Keep up your pipedream; I have 30 other teams to rip you on.
raysox Posted July 26, 2010 Posted July 26, 2010 These are pretty bad to be honest. I get what you're trying to do, but they're still really bad. If you want sponsors on a jersey, this is how it should be done.The colts shoulder stripes are uneven and sloppy. You tried to make your own shadow, and they don't even touch the outlines, and looks like some weird design. The background stories should be more thought out though. @MichaelDanger19 | Dribbble
gueman Posted July 26, 2010 Posted July 26, 2010 I would think that the NFL would make the corporate sponsor logo placement consistent with all teams. I doubt you would have some on the lower belly, some on the front and back some small some larger. So far you are creating a mess with all the inconsistencies. Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. P. J. O'Rourke
hugevolsfan Posted July 27, 2010 Posted July 27, 2010 I have to agree that the placement of the sponsors logo is off big time. I will not like football uniforms if they are like this in the future. My Fictional Football League Version 3 My Fictional Football Leagues WebsiteMy Church Website
LetsGoOakland9 Posted July 27, 2010 Posted July 27, 2010 not only do you have corny background stories but you have bad designs
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.