WSU151

It's actually fairly common. The Bills have a logo on top of the pants stripe, and in NCAA, Florida has it, and Louisville had it last year.

I agree with the rationale, but that ^^ makes me want to play UNO for six hours.

Is it weird to watch a 1995 Islanders game just to watch the Fisherman jerseys in action? As untraditional as they were... I actually like them.

Design A has a complete different number font (across all numbers) than Design B, as noted in the page with the photos. The other fishy thing is the Vikings are the only other team I've known to take uniform pictures at old Giants Stadium, and that was 2006. I doubt the Saints would have done that in 2000. Also, they pair the real life version of the jersey from Design A photo with pants from Design B photo. Look at the 1's.

I think both helmets you mentioned would look really awkward if the logos were facing back. What would you do for the Seahawks?

But this could be an eBay hoax, but glad they didn't. They look way too much like the Ravens, sans purple. That would've been a huge upgrade, except for the white pants. That number font in gold outlined in white would have worked too. The white numbers with stripeless pants and black-white-black helmet stripes would have been almost a carbon-copy of Purdue. EDIT: didn't see the black stripe on the pants with the logo (those pants must be from 2002 or later because of the NFL Equipment logo).

You think he's a beast after playing one preseason game? It's not like the dude threw 4 touchdowns. Or any. So are Yale's. Always one of the best looking games of the year.

McDonald's ?The Gateway Arch 3rd jersey - I know people love it - I think the arch looks completely out of place on it.Yep. I'm lovin' it. Ba dum bum bam bummmmmmmm

Who would've thought this look would be lightyears better than what they have now. That switch to nike really cost the Seahawks. I'd love to see a remake of these uniforms, and they'd sell like hot-cakes. Did it? Are Seahawks jersey sales at an all-time low? Since when did sales indicate the uniform is aesthetically pleasing? Especially on these forums where the modern, trendy uniforms are criticized he most. So how did the move to Nike "cost" the Seahawks?

Who would've thought this look would be lightyears better than what they have now. That switch to nike really cost the Seahawks. I'd love to see a remake of these uniforms, and they'd sell like hot-cakes. Did it? Are Seahawks jersey sales at an all-time low?

If you want to see awful, look at the Colorado Avalanche (I'm a Red Wings fan). Luckily, baseball stirrups and the Avalanche are closely related.

Those are boring. 1990s blandness at its finest.2 words I never thought I'd see used together in a uniform discussion context I actually agree with that. Another uniform that fits into that small category: If you want to see boring Astros unis, look at the current set. The 90s star unis at least had some sense of modern aesthetic to them. No way I would call them boring.

I agree, no baseball player should be above mlb that everyone has to wear their number. I get it, the country was mean once upon a time and didn't allow colored people in the mlb, do we have to be reminded of it every year? If everyone is truly equal then we shouldn't have to come across as kissing their asses for the past still. But that's just my opinion. While I think everyone wearing 42 is a bit much, I don't think the impact of Jackie Robinson's achievements should be ignored or saved for the major anniversaries. I think remembering him and paying tribute to him every year is the right thing to do.

Somehow I missed this gem. This is phenomenal. One of my favorites of the thread.

Which hats? The mustard yellow, or the pillbox style with the horizontal stripes?

Meh...the Padres are currently heavy navy and white (they pretty much look like the Yankees without pinstripes). The original PETCO set was the best, with the khaki and a little light blue.

Watching Pirates vs. Yankees...I really like the Pirates' BP jerseys.

There's something about the logo that's just awkward. I think it's the huge forehead. And some of the overall lines seem to be off.

One exception is Texas Tech. They've always looked good as a lot-of-black, accented-with-red team. Kind of adds a little mystery to the image.

I dig those just like they are. I have nothing against their current color scheme, but the old colors are pretty sweet. I agree that these would be good for the transition to a different name.The spear logo just looks too much like Florida State.

Still not sure what league they're playing in, or if they'll ever play a game, but the Yuma Desert Ghosts have started trickling out their uniform design starting with their home and away caps. Huh. Not a logo I'd have chosen. Looks more like a trouser snake than a desert ghost.

They no longer use the roundel logo. They don't have a plethora of other logos - "50 something non-primary logo" is not only an exaggeration, it's a really bad exaggeration. Check out the mothership and see what logos they currently use. It's not many. They don't change home jersey colors that often, either.

I really like this one for the Heat. Has a throwback feel to it from when the played at Miami Arena. Nice job.

I always thought the shoulder patch was awesome. The updated one was okay, and better drawn, but the original was great in its own right.

Looking at this picture, if they were all "authentic" all six jerseys together would have cost $2,400 at $400 a piece. If they were the "premeir" jerseys they would have cost $1,200 at $200 a piece. Sadly they are all fakes and it probably cost $300 at $50 a piece. THATS THE PROBLEM! People don't care if they are real or not. It cost them significantly less. On the bright side, they have an amazing VHS collection. EDIT: DG_Now got it, previous page. Kudos, sir.