AnPheitseog

Didnt the Pats keep the red jersey in the style guide as an alt, even though they havent worn them in forever because of the recently gotten rid of one helmet rule?

If it's not broke, dont fix it. A lot of the NHL isnt broke, and what's broken just need tweaks. not massive overhauls

CCM has switched away from the EDGE template to their own CCM quicklite. I own both the replica and authentic quicklite and, tbh, if CCM gets it and brings quicklite to the NHL i'll be ecstatic. Also, regardless of who gets the contract SP sports is STILL likely to be the ones making the jerseys. As they did for CCM, reebok, and adidas. just slapping a new logo on it EDIT: It's also worth mentioning that fanatics already makes the retail NFL jerseys and they're not half bad.

Rangers is designed by nike. The nike designed ones are all more expensive, then there's the city connect tax too. Yankees and reds are both pre nike designs so cheaper

This is why I like erring on the side of being smaller. You can always buy a hat stretcher and stretch it to your needs. Much harder going the other way.

Argos make me sad. Small fixes and it would be SO HIGH, but then they do things like solid powder blue socks with solid powder blue pants. and no stripes on anything

It's a team issued MiC, but it's not a primegreen(21-22). Since MiCs are not sold at retail, all of them are team issued, game issued, or game worn.

Trident for VA Beach

So, they're using SKRC. so that white layer allows it to be seethrough, as it's the only layer for most of the number. If they used stack, you wouldnt be able to see the stripes because there would be a red layer below a blue layer below the white.

See, that would make it worse IMO. need to plan for 2 days (for the home team), rather than just 1. aka fully agree, ditch it.

Because they are their home uniforms for the entire playoffs.

And dont forget about the current pope. not a named king, but still an elected monarch

It's not even good for the top teams. I'm a galaxy fan and have been unable to buy adidas polos for the past couple years for them.

I like the new NYCFC kits but yeah. From certain angles, they looked like an all orange kit.

Can we please make it so that I can actually see where to go to react. I know where to go based off trial and error, but wish i could SEE it.

Starting with black shouldnt be used, these are jerseys that just look GOOD. Besides Arizona, and I should clarify that the jersey is no more or less offensive than the red version. In short yes, I agree. The teams shouldnt have worn them, but the jerseys on their own look good to non offensive.

I like post count, but i'm not as long in the tooth as some others here.

But, there's also the fact that the flag jerseys were their primary set and fans are more likely to buy the regular set.

Honestly, they contrast enough for me. Light uniform v dark uniform is the guideline for me. So, the light blue v dark blue works. That said, green, v red is a no go for sure.

Sports are entertainment. What's the goal of entertainment? to have fun. At least, it was last i checked.

Missing the point. The standard in France is FC. Football Club. Take a look at ligue 1 and teams across france. Ever more reason it should have been FC Montréal, as it's a name that works in both French and English. Montréal FC also has backing in French as well. Yes, foot is used a lot in France and in French. just like basket is to shorten from basketball. Has no bearing that the Impact should have been FC Montréal or Montréal FC. Back to the '32s discussion. Should be the '32s, though I like WFT more than I expected.

In France, 1,16, 30 are traditionally saved for goalkeepers. To the point that Messi needed an exemption to wear 30. That's the problem with it.

still infuriates me he's wearing 30.

Hoping the Galaxy goes back to a blue and gold sash, and goes away from the grey like the now old one.

I'm torn. I like the wordmark because it matches the home, but also think the script looks better. But, i do like the corrected one better.