MCM0313

Have what? They aren’t allowed three shells, are they? EDIT: my bad.

I will actually make an exception for looks with contrasting socks. Or at least one: Panthers with black jerseys and pants and blue socks. That’s my favorite look for them. I dunno. I feel like a lot of the jargon is interchangeable to an extent. To me, the Jags with teal jerseys and pants and black socks look much better than with teal jerseys and black pants and socks, or teal jerseys and white pants and socks, or even teal jerseys and socks with black pants. White pants and black socks would look better - that’s their OG combo and isn’t worn enough anymore - but I would argue that the combo pictured is among their better ones. Definitely better than anything involving plain white socks.

Those guys look like they’re about to start slow-dancing.

Eagles will no doubt ruin the look by wearing white socks and tweeting emojis. Packers, of course, will wear mismatched socks - some green, some white - as is their way.

Interesting. I had never noticed that.

Is BoJack off the wagon again?!

I’m more intrigued by the space in (Travis?) McNeil’s surname. Which reminds me of old footage I saw of Super Bowl XX, where the Patriots’ Larry McGrew had a similar gap after the Mc.

I don’t think it would work for the Browns, but it works well for the Padres. Also: lighten up that sand color juuuuuust a pinch and it would be perfect for the Arizona Cardinals, just as @HOOVER mentioned. Crimson and cream is a combo that somebody needs to lean into (and, no, the OU Sooners’ anthracite basketball jerseys with crimson letters and cream numbers don’t count).

It’s enforced about as well as Google’s policy against scam ads.

All players are required to wear their socks the same style and color?! Can somebody explain the 49ers, Cowboys, et al.?

I’m pretty sure a bunch of the 2013-18(?) Jaguars hated their uniforms. Or at least the helmets.

He was gonna call it Peterland, but that gay bar by the airport already had it.

The league is to blame. They took away the requirement of socks being white on the bottom a few years back. The teams are to blame for plain white socks and pants. As well as fans who use and similar emojis.

Darker? Wow, that’s the opposite of what we’ve been expecting.

That looks almost exactly like Columbia blue. Interesting.

I want to see a “which Broncos have better threads” article on bleacherreport or a similar site, comparing Boise State with Denver, once Denver’s new look is official. Spoiler alert: it may not be the pro team that looks better.

Nike: “You’ll get dull grey and like it!” It’s because navy blue is the second-most-intimidating color out there, behind only black.

The tile color looks very much like Oiler blue to me. The police car color looks lighter and more powdery, almost like Carolina blue, if perhaps a bit more saturated. Not sure we’ve had a light blue *that* light in the NFL before.

Yeah, I get the feeling this will be lighter and greener than Columbia blue. I was of the understanding that the “Houston blue” would be trim-only even on the alt(s). …the light blue which neither team truly wants to fully embrace anyway.

Cyan, at least in terms of digital displays, is equal parts blue and green. Would turquoise maybe be a pinch more to the green side? I think they are close anyway.

Houszona Texabacks?

Is he wearing nail polish? I mean, more power to him if so, but certainly unexpected.

Titans. Dude won’t type their name.

It looks incredibly wrong for the Dolphins, Bengals, Jaguars, Broncos, and Chargers at minimum. I’d say the Rams, Saints, Seahawks, and Ravens also look jarring. That said…I agree that most of these are passable, and a few might even be an improvement on their teams’ current helmets.

Nike is so blatantly lazy.