Epiphanic Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Is it better than you're previous logo? Yes.Is it what should be used? No.VitaminD's critique is spot on. I do think it look better than what you had, but it looks like too much is going on. Since you're trying for a "timeless" feel you need to keep it extremely simple. "In the arena of logic, I fight unarmed."I tweet & tumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Am A Flaming Douche Bag Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 The set is to plain. The two colours are too light to be the main colours in the jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 By the way that is supposed to be 'TBDR'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiodrama Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 By the way that is supposed to be 'TBDR'.Why would you have a "TBDR" logo for a Tampa Bay Rays concept? Weren't you purposely dropping the "Devil"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 By the way that is supposed to be 'TBDR'.Why would you have a "TBDR" logo for a Tampa Bay Rays concept? Weren't you purposely dropping the "Devil"?But what do you think of the Tampa Bay logo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 By the way that is supposed to be 'TBDR'.Why would you have a "TBDR" logo for a Tampa Bay Rays concept? Weren't you purposely dropping the "Devil"?But what do you think of the Tampa Bay logo?Well. If that question right there isn't a begging for attention... https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 By the way that is supposed to be 'TBDR'.Why would you have a "TBDR" logo for a Tampa Bay Rays concept? Weren't you purposely dropping the "Devil"?But what do you think of the Tampa Bay logo?Well. If that question right there isn't a begging for attention...C&C Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gueman Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 By the way that is supposed to be 'TBDR'.Why would you have a "TBDR" logo for a Tampa Bay Rays concept? Weren't you purposely dropping the "Devil"?But what do you think of the Tampa Bay logo?Well. If that question right there isn't a begging for attention...C&C Please.OK...well they are dropping the Devil officially. So you don't need the D. Ok. Now all great designs shouldn't look forced. The edges are way to choppy like a 7 year old cut it from craft paper. TAKE YOUR TIME! And you are forcing the ray into a design that can't support it. Also the colors remind me of the old joke that when the Marlins were entering the league there colors were going to be SweetN'Lo pink, Equal blue and the Yellow the other sugar substitute uses. You need to use a dark color, and NOT BLACK!. Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. P. J. O'Rourke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted July 11, 2007 Author Share Posted July 11, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarperK Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 1. Seriously, watermark isn't needed at this point, just makes the image look a little worse.2. The heavy gradients in the background are kind of distracting.....*great idea there.3. Since the uniforms aren't anything special, basically a blank template with your logo..id just show off the logo on a larger scale.4. Keep going with the logo. I like where your going, actually creating something with some meaning behind it. Just needs to go thru some more refining IMO.*take that with a grain of humor please ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB61 Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 The hat's too blurry, the socks are pixelated, the number is too high up, and I still don't know what the hell that monogram is supposed to say.THere you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted July 11, 2007 Author Share Posted July 11, 2007 The hat's too blurry, the socks are pixelated, the number is too high up, and I still don't know what the hell that monogram is supposed to say.THere you go.You come off as a very rude person sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarperK Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 The hat's too blurry, the socks are pixelated, the number is too high up, and I still don't know what the hell that monogram is supposed to say.THere you go.You come off as a very rude person sometimes.You come off as an over-sensitive person alot of times ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 So is it Tampa Bay Rays? Then Tampa Bay Devil Rays? Now Tampa Rays? Make up your mind!Take off the watermark, no one is going to steal the work.Put some names on the jerseys... the Rays aren't the Yankees/Sox/etc...Good job on changing the colours... about the only improvement I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB61 Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 The hat's too blurry, the socks are pixelated, the number is too high up, and I still don't know what the hell that monogram is supposed to say.THere you go.You come off as a very rude person sometimes.I'm actually pretty loveable. I just like to poop on people who thinks their don't stink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 I'll speak as the resident Rays fan, and I don't like this at all. The logo reminds me of a Rorschach inkblot test. It doesn't identify clearly what it is supposed to be representing. This logo looks like a jumble of different ideas. Patsox, no offense to you, but please take the C&C seriously. Originally, we were actually trying to help you, but now that you'vr closed your eyes and plugged your ears, many of us are not willing to assist you, because of the immature way you portray yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 The hat's too blurry, the socks are pixelated, the number is too high up, and I still don't know what the hell that monogram is supposed to say.THere you go.You come off as a very rude person sometimes.Why must you make it so easy for us?On the concept, still plain-jane. Not much going on. The logo as a "Ray" is still too much of a stretch. And your also trying to incorporate too many letters into one monogram. I mean, this last one you've titled "Tampa Rays", yet you still feature a "B" in the monogram. Doesn't make any sense. Besides, they play in St. Petersburg and would never go by just Tampa as long as they play there.Come on, Patsy, put some effort into it. LISTEN to people.And why the hell are you wanting to wage a war against anybody under 17? (see his member title... unless he's already changed it again) Some group of pre-schoolers still your lunch money? https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Hmm, this logo looks awfully familiar.http://boards.sportslogos.net/index.php?sh...=tampa+bay+rays Pittsburgh Arsenal - Elite Football League (NFL) - est. 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.