jkrdevil Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 Blatter: FIFA exploring alternate-site strategies for 2010 World CupLONDON (AP) -- FIFA president Sepp Blatter has spoken to three countries about hosting the 2010 World Cup if a natural catastrophe forces it away from South Africa.It forms the Plan B drawn up by FIFA with less than two years until football's showpiece tournament heads to Africa for the first time.Concerns are mounting about South Africa fulfilling its hosting obligations after Tuesday's announcement that the Port Elizabeth stadium is unlikely to be completed in time for next June's Confederations Cup tuneup event.The World Cup preparations have been plagued by stadium construction delays, security fears, transport problems and the possibility of power outages."I have spoken to three possible, not only possible, but three associations and countries that would be able to stage the World Cup in one year's time," Blatter said in an interview broadcast on Thursday by Sky News. "They need one year (to prepare)."Blatter would not name the countries when asked if 1966 host England was one of his options.My guess two of they three possible emergency sites are England and the US. It seems those two countries could hold it on very short notice as stadium construction would not be needed.Sites for a US World Cup (either 2018 or 2010 emergency) would probably be:1. Giants Stadium (new if it is opened by then), East Rutherford, NJ- Capacity 82,0002. Rose Bowl, Pasadena, CA- 91,1363. FedEx Field, Landover, MD- 91,7044. Gillette Stadium Foxboro, MA- 68,7565. Soldier Field Chicago, IL- 61,5006. New Cowboys Stadium, Arlington, TX- 80,0007. Qwest Field, Seattle, WA- 67,0008. Raymond James Stadium, Tampa, FL- 65,857 (bigger with Super Bowl type expansion)9. Investco Field, Denver, CO- 76,125I took in consideration media market size as well as geographic location as the organizers will probably want at least one site from each region of the US. Also with the exception of the Rose Bowl all these stadiums will have been built after 1994. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEW.ERA Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 Spain is also a possible plan for 2010 as they are a backup for Euro 2012, as they have 5 UEFA 5-star stadiums and can easily have 5 more that are capable.Camp NouEstadi Olímpic Lluís CompanysEstadio Olímpico de SevillaSantiago Bernabéu StadiumVicente Calderón Stadium JETS|PACK|JAYS|NUFC|BAMA|BOMBERS|RAPS|ORANJE| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nation Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 The weakside with any England bid is that a host city cannot have multiple venues.So cities like London cannot utilize both Wembley and The Emirates. And Manchester cannot utilize both Old Trafford and City of Manchester Stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJMorris3 Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 The weakside with any England bid is that a host city cannot have multiple venues.So cities like London cannot utilize both Wembley and The Emirates. And Manchester cannot utilize both Old Trafford and City of Manchester Stadium.England would certainly work, though, I'd see it as follows.Birmingham - Villa ParkDerby - Pride Park StadiumLeeds - Elland RoadLeicester - Walkers StadiumLiverpool - AnfieldLondon - Wembley StadiumManchester - Old TraffordMiddlesbrough - Riverside StadiumNewcastle - St. James' ParkSheffield - HillsboroughSouthampton - St. Mary's StadiumSunderland - Stadium of LightSmallest is 32,500.Spain's bid might look to be as follows:Barcelona - Camp NouBetis - Estadio Manuel Ruiz de LoperaBilbao - Estadio San MamesElche - Estadio Manuel Martinez ValeroLa Coruña - Estadio RiazorLas Palmas - Estadio Gran CanariaMadrid - Estadio Santiago BernabeuMalaga - La RosaledaMurcia - Estadio Nueva CondominaSevilla - Estadio de la CartujaValencia - Estadio MestallaZaragoza - La RomaredaSmallest of the 12 is 32,520. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 As far as the host nations are concerned, I think that the US was contacted, and either one of Spain or England was, but unless FIFA may want to keep it in the Southern Hemisphere, I am starting to think that Australia/New Zealand might have received a call too. The tournament is scheduled for June/July still, so it will be open season for US bid cities. Basically every NFL city will try to get it as most new stadiums have the width for a FIFA pitch and laying grass over FieldTurf is not and issue. They can be very creative with venues and game times as European/African teams can play in the East/Central and South American teams don't matter as most are in our time zone(s). This is getting interesting since Sepp is showing he is not a very good leader. When is his term up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-kj Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 The weakside with any England bid is that a host city cannot have multiple venues.Actually, I think they allow one city to use two venues, but only one city. Buy some t-shirts and stuff at KJ Shop! KJ Branded | Behance portfolio POTD 2013-08-22 On 7/14/2012 at 2:20 AM, tajmccall said: When it comes to style, ya'll really should listen to Kev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 As far as the host nations are concerned, I think that the US was contacted, and either one of Spain or England was, but unless FIFA may want to keep it in the Southern Hemisphere, I am starting to think that Australia/New Zealand might have received a call too. The tournament is scheduled for June/July still, so it will be open season for US bid cities. Basically every NFL city will try to get it as most new stadiums have the width for a FIFA pitch and laying grass over FieldTurf is not and issue. They can be very creative with venues and game times as European/African teams can play in the East/Central and South American teams don't matter as most are in our time zone(s). This is getting interesting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEW.ERA Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 Here's the thing the US Wants to make a bid for 2018 or 2022 and if they do take over for South Africa that pretty much takes them out of the picture.. but I'm pretty confident that South Africa will host it and do a great job at it JETS|PACK|JAYS|NUFC|BAMA|BOMBERS|RAPS|ORANJE| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 Sites for a US World Cup (either 2018 or 2010 emergency) would probably be:1. Giants Stadium (new if it is opened by then), East Rutherford, NJ- Capacity 82,0002. Rose Bowl, Pasadena, CA- 91,1363. FedEx Field, Landover, MD- 91,7044. Gillette Stadium Foxboro, MA- 68,7565. Soldier Field Chicago, IL- 61,5006. New Cowboys Stadium, Arlington, TX- 80,0007. Qwest Field, Seattle, WA- 67,0008. Raymond James Stadium, Tampa, FL- 65,857 (bigger with Super Bowl type expansion)9. Investco Field, Denver, CO- 76,125Aren't there usually 12 venues for a World Cup? IIRC that's how many Germany had. The other three for the U.S. could be:10. University of Phoenix Stadium, Glendale, AZ - 73,719 (expanded capacity)11. Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, IN - 70,000 (expanded capacity)12. Reliant Stadium, Houston, TX - 71,500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardgr Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 From what has been said at the bigsoccer philly forum the Linc is not compliant for field dimension this is because the seating area just beyond the end zone on the sides are angled, so without a redesign I would think that the Linc is out. So for the US hosting I would see the following 12 sites Groups A & BGilletteNew MeadowlandsFedEx FieldGroups C & DRaymond James or Dolphins StadiumReliant StadiumCleveland Browns StadiumGroups E & FSoldier FieldFord FieldInvesco FieldGroups G & HRose BowlQwest FieldU of Phoenix StadiumThe US is most likely in line for the 2022 Cup, which would probably go to Australia if we host 2010, 2014 is Brazil and 2018 is almost guaranteed to be Englands so for emergency hosting for 2010 I could see the following in order:1) The US 2) Spain3) FranceI do not list England because London will be busy preparing for the 2012 summer games. As for the other 2, Spain is very close to being ready as it stands, Madrid lost the 2012 Olympics to London so I am sure they would step into the 2010 role willingly, especially now as the reigning European champion. France having just hosted in 1998 should already be ready to do this, Paris also lost the 2010 games to London so this could be a nice replacement.I left off Germany because they literally just hosted, and although the stadiums are definately ready I do not think FIFA would do this. Italy was not listed because their stadia are generally the same as those from Italy 90. Japan and Australia may also be options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEW.ERA Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 And the way the process is going for the 2012 Euro, Spain has been asked to take over if Poland/Ukraine can't get it done JETS|PACK|JAYS|NUFC|BAMA|BOMBERS|RAPS|ORANJE| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkJourney Posted July 10, 2008 Author Share Posted July 10, 2008 If South Africa does fall through Spain should get the 2010 World Cup. I nice gift for winning Euro 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.