Jump to content

SFGiants58

Members
  • Posts

    8,282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    79

Posts posted by SFGiants58

  1. 5 minutes ago, BBTV said:


    Going for 2 was absolutely the right call. They had momentum, they’re on the road. Dallas was reeling and tired, and he didn’t want them to potentially start OT with the ball.  I would imagine analytics show that going for 2 is the right play. Even if they don’t, it is. 
     

    But after the penalty, maybe reassess. I still admire him, but it’s certainly questionable. 

     

    Well, that does make sense. I just tend towards hyper-cautious attitudes in situations like this, even though it's probably the wrong call (see any number of overtime losses by the team that came back to win a game).

  2. 5 hours ago, the admiral said:

    And hanging every shortcoming of Fields on bad coaching, bad protection, bad receivers, and good opposing defenses means that they, albeit in a different way, are also just basing their entire assessment on vibes. 


    Putting any faith in Justin Fields on the field is like putting faith in a YouTube person to make a good apology video. It just won’t happen and time will make it look worse.

     

    ”All aboard!!! The Justin Fields train, riding down the tracks to the disappointment station…”

  3. NY Jets vs. Cleveland

     

    Detroit vs. Dallas

     

    Tennessee vs. Houston

    Atlanta vs. Chicago

    Miami vs. Baltimore

    New Orleans vs. Tampa Bay

    New England vs. Buffalo

    Arizona vs. Philadelphia

    Carolina vs. Jacksonville

    Las Vegas vs. Indianapolis

    LA Rams vs. NY Giants

    San Francisco vs. Washington

    Pittsburgh vs. Seattle

    Cincinnati vs. Kansas City

    LA Chargers vs. Denver

    Green Bay vs. Minnesota

  4. I mean, I’m all for being cautious with Purdy. He’s good, but I wouldn’t call him MVP good. If you put him on another team, you’re looking at a sixth-seed team. The AFC North in particular is a weak spot for him this year.

     

    My point about the AFC is more than I don’t think the NFC contenders can really hold up against what the AFC North (sans Steelers) and the AFCW/S/E winners have to offer.

    • Like 1
  5. 7 minutes ago, BBTV said:

     

    I think I'm on Team Baker now, as long as they bring back those commercials where he lives in the stadium.


    Well, the RayJay seems like a decent living space. You’ve got a big pirate ship with which to mess around! The closest I’ll get is finally building the Lego pirate ship in my “I have no display space” backlog.

    • Like 2
  6. 36 minutes ago, Lights Out said:

     

    I think the sport absolutely needs a salary floor so we don't have a bunch of "start-and-park" teams like the Marlins every year. But the big-market spending is becoming so out of control that unless there's also a hard salary cap, I don't see how it doesn't eventually end in disaster for the sport.


    Get prepared for another big work stoppage once the next CBA negotiations start.

  7. New Orleans vs. LA Rams

     

    Cincinnati vs. Pittsburgh

    Buffalo vs. LA Chargers

     

    Washington vs. NY Jets

    Detroit vs. Minnesota

    Cleveland vs. Houston

    Green Bay vs. Carolina

    Seattle vs. Tennessee

    Indianapolis vs. Atlanta

    Jacksonville vs. Tampa

    Dallas vs. Miami

    Arizona vs. Chicago

    New England vs. Denver

     

    Las Vegas vs. Kansas City

    NY Giants vs. Philadelphia

    Baltimore vs. San Francisco

  8. LA Chargers vs. Las Vegas

     

    Minnesota vs. Cincinnati

    Pittsburgh vs. Indianapolis

    Denver vs. Detroit

     

    NY Giants vs. New Orleans

    Chicago vs. Cleveland

    Atlanta vs. Carolina

    Tampa Bay vs. Green Bay

    NY Jets vs. Miami

    Kansas City vs. New England

    Houston vs. Tennessee

    San Francisco vs. Arizona

    Washington vs. LA Rams

    Dallas vs. Buffalo

    Baltimore vs. Jacksonville

     

    Philadelphia vs. Seattle

  9. 4 hours ago, DG_ThenNowForever said:

    Dray out for the rest of the season seems the best punishment for him. The Warriors can't and won't control him; the NBA needs to.


    At this rate, I’m expecting a big public freak out that ends with a TMZ headline and several thousand dollars in property damage. Think Barret Robbins or Alonzo Spellman-level bad.

  10. You can't really replace the best three-point shooter ever (Steph), but you can replace the diminishing returns of the supporting cast around him.

     

    Klay's decline is definitely troubling, especially after the contract talks stalled out earlier this year. While I don't think he'd leave the Warriors, leaving him behind to rebuild a younger core sure sounds appealing.

  11. 6 minutes ago, FiddySicks said:

    I love Draymond. Dude was the glue for four championship squads. Even I think this :censored: is getting tiresome. The league should suspend him for half of the season at this point  

     

    It's just depressing to see how trashy he's become the past two seasons. Like, how hard is it not to be slapping and punching players? I get that he might be "in the right" or "protecting the other players," but this trash is excessive. No suspension is going to fix those deep-seeded issues.

     

    It's probably time for the Warriors to rebuild, given the state of the team right now. Ah well, getting four titles out of a championship window means I can't complain about the team for at least 15-20 years.

  12. 8 minutes ago, Cujo said:

     

    But that's not the "Giants Way".

     

    Since when has SF needed big name bats to win? They won 3 titles just picking dudes like Juan Uribe and Pat Burrell off the streets,

     

    Well, last time the Giants went for big names (albeit in pitching), we had the whole Bobby Evans era where every signing and trade turned putrid almost immediately. Remember trying to give money to Cueto, Samardzija, and Melancon?

     

    5 minutes ago, FiddySicks said:

     

    Speaking of that, @Sport instituted a ten year moratorium on complaining about your team after winning a title (good rule). Giants are in year nine, and boy do I have some bitching to do. Can’t wait. 

     

     

    If it's a rapid succession of titles like the Giants had, that moratorium is a little more in flux. But yeah, a decade moratorium works.

     

    1 minute ago, Cujo said:

     

    He gonna selfishly hold onto Trout until it's too late and they can get nothing in return for him, like they did with Ohtani?

     

    Mike Trout is already on the back end of his career and very injury-prone. You would never get that much for him now and his legacy is now that the Angels utterly wasted his talent and he was never competitive or brash enough to escape that situation. Complacency means he's an all-time great who only has MVP trophies to show for it.

    • Like 2
  13. Just now, ruttep said:

     

     

    Still think a salary floor is more important than a salary cap: Something that'll force all teams to at least field a competitive roster.

     

    With this crop of owners? A salary floor will probably never happen, even though it's far more important an issue than growing player salaries.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.