dont care

That’s awful and it just made me notice that the swoosh in the “e” is the opposite of that of the globe.

You say that like they ever were

It’s like the wishbone collar but worse

The FA Cup isn’t just premier league though, it’s teams from nearly every level of English play, also FA cup games don’t count towards the tables. The inseason tournament is a complete fabrication. There is no benefit to the teams, and minimum impact to the players making a few extra bucks.

See

Because neither of their pants have stripes currently.

So a retail helmet, and one done in the 80’s that a believe still is painted just with a latex paint just in the reverse of what it is today. Regardless they don’t use decals today.

They still do hand paint them, to get technical, they tape the stripes on a black helmet and paint it orange and peel the tape off leaving the black shell underneath showing the stripes.

Yea, but his parents should have the common sense to see that’s not in good taste in the slightest.

Well now we know why new balance doesn’t have any big colleges or pro leagues contracts

Numbers on the helmet?

Your team lost, get over it.

They have, the players/teams are choosing not to wear them

They can and they do, this is purely a fashion statement like the undershirt skirts in the nfl.

He’s not a year 2, 3, 4, or 5 year guy either

Delete

Probably not because they only sell them at the arena

TD Garden isn’t close, the Celtics hang less banners than the hitmen. Now if the hung individual banners for their retired numbers rather than consolidating them the Celtics would nearly double them. Regardless the bruins wouldn’t have enough banners to top them still I believe.

They would have had to wear them in the offseason, and throughout practice this week to break them in. If they haven’t been seen yet they aren’t wearing them.

Stop trying to make this a thing. It only worked for the aggies. Not every team needs racing stripes.

Not with the biker shorts

Being found no guilty does not and never has meant innocent. It just means guilt was not found based on the evidence provided. You have absolutely no knowledge of case law, and how there are plenty of people that get found “not guilty” not because they didn’t do the crime but based on having a legal team find every loophole to get the verdict they want, or an inept prosecution. The OJ Simpson trial being a perfect example of this.

Why are they still using the Deshawn spunk graphic?

What black?

Being found not guilty isn’t the same as innocence, and never has been. Being found not guilty means that the prosecution couldn’t make a case to find the defendant guilty “beyond reasonable doubt” which is a much higher threshold to prove rather than civil cases that just need a “likely” level of proof to win a case