WBeltz

God I still love that jersey/set. The merchandise was also excellent. All around a 10/10.

Fenerbache third kit leaked with the new PUMA 3rd design. I don't hate it & I get the concept, but this should be more of a fan jersey rather than an on pitch one.

Venezia released their home kit. I would not mind seeing teams that don’t have an advert/sponsor on the front of their shirts put their name or nickname on the front of the shirt like this. https://www.footyheadlines.com/2021/07/kappa-venezia-21-22-serie-home-kit.html?m=1

It will always blow my mind that the Eagles brass are all “we want to bring back the Kelly green throwbacks” and make a fuss out of it, when they could easily change their uniforms to Kelly green if they want. I know they probably won’t because of the Super Bowl win in the current set, but if you want the change just go through with it.

The shorts color needs to be flipped. Red on the left and blue on right. But god I hate this. I know there’s only so much you can do with stripe designs but JESUS.

Philadelphia Union PSG Getting rid of an iconic piece of their kits for no reason. (At least PSG's is rumored for 1 year)

The away kits have been pretty nice. The home and thirds have been VERY hit or miss.

I think if only one or two teams did it (BVB and Man City) it would be OK. But the fact that all of the club Puma teams are doing it is what the problem is. I don't mind it in a vacuum of a couple of teams taking it on. But Puma's entire roster??

Maybe it’s because I got into football when these uniforms were around, but I like them.

Well, at least the Colts could be looking at a Top 5 pick for a QB next year if this is a sign of things to come.

Here is all Houston needs to do: - Switch to red jerseys as primary, paired with white pants and either blue or red socks. - Use the red pants they used to have on the road with blue socks - Make all navy their alt (can be the current or the CR) Considering how blue/dark color heavy the AFC south is, the Texans being red would definitely break up the Royal (Colts), Navy (Titans) & Black (Jags) that is primarily worn.

Who would’ve thought it would be Oregon to do so?

Same as Iowa States new numbers tho. Or at least similar

I’ll admit that I too am a 24-going-on-25 year old Abe Simpson.

I wouldn’t mind seeing a team like USF wear these, although I feel like they’ve worn a very similar helmet to this recently.

One is usually on offense and the other on defense. That way neither player is on the field at the same time, which is why it was a thing.

It’s like they said “referees are zebras? Nah, they’re tigers now.”

So the XFL is also going the Starter route. I wonder if Nike, adidas and UA avoided them (& the AAF) because they think/know they might not be so successful?

You think they would've done something along the lines of "prototype" jerseys that would have been unveiled until the real things came out. Ala the Nike/NFL deal, granted not all the teams then changed but they showcased something, even if it's like the AAF with dummy uniforms made by Starter.

San Jose's new home kits have grown on me. There's just something about them that I like but I don't know what. Once/if the add a sponsor/advertiser it'll take some getting used to like them again though.

I'd like to imagine if the Nets did follow through with this identity, and it lasted until the present day what the uniforms would look like. Would they have still gone black heavy w/a Brooklyn move? Would this be a throwback that the young players think is "fire"?

The San Diego Padres need an alternate that says "Dads" or "Fathers" on it, since you know Padre is Spanish for Father/Dad

Pretty positive that green and yellow are pretty close in shade to the A's

I like the new uniforms, maybe just tweak the numbers, yoke and the pant stripe and it'll look much better.

I feel like Under Armour has dropped the ball with Wisconsin's football uniforms. I know you can do so much with a red & white color combo, but I absolutely LOVED this combo when they were with adidas.