JQK Posted June 12, 2003 Share Posted June 12, 2003 I can name 7 people on this board who could have done a better job that that...Looks minor league... Looks NBDL... if teams in the NBDL had logos...Bad... Stay Tuned Sports Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-kj Posted June 12, 2003 Share Posted June 12, 2003 The logo itself isn't a horrible logo. The production quality's good.It's just that the logo--and I think, the name--are boring. Dull. Yaaaawn. (Heck, even the king of simplicity, JQK, doesn't like it. *heh*)I'd be curious to know who JQK's seven are. :cool: Buy some t-shirts and stuff at KJ Shop! KJ Branded | Behance portfolio POTD 2013-08-22 On 7/14/2012 at 2:20 AM, tajmccall said: When it comes to style, ya'll really should listen to Kev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMS1122 Posted June 12, 2003 Share Posted June 12, 2003 I'd be curious to know who JQK's seven are. :cool:you're not the only one :: GMS on dribbbleErie Apparel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjrbaseball Posted June 13, 2003 Share Posted June 13, 2003 Big cat names don't go with basketball teams though!What about the Carolina Cougars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjrbaseball Posted June 13, 2003 Share Posted June 13, 2003 Also, is the WNBA Charlotte Sting going to change its name/logo?For the most part, WNBA teams have similar color schemes and derivative names from their co-owned NBA counterparts. For example, Sacramento Kings (NBA), Monarchs (WNBA) ... Washington Wizards (NBA), Mystics (WNBA), and so on.Charlotte Sting is definitely a derivative from Hornets, and they have the Hornets' teal as their primary color. Maybe they should become the Charlotte Claws or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwertman Posted June 13, 2003 Share Posted June 13, 2003 I personally dont think its that bad...it isnt that great either.I say it rates about a 5.5 on the crap-o-meter Kings Cross AFC -BIP, Winnipeg Falcons - TNFF, St. Louis Archers - MLF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitroseed Posted June 13, 2003 Author Share Posted June 13, 2003 Also, is the WNBA Charlotte Sting going to change its name/logo?For the most part, WNBA teams have similar color schemes and derivative names from their co-owned NBA counterparts. For example, Sacramento Kings (NBA), Monarchs (WNBA) ... Washington Wizards (NBA), Mystics (WNBA), and so on.Charlotte Sting is definitely a derivative from Hornets, and they have the Hornets' teal as their primary color. Maybe they should become the Charlotte Claws or something.I believe that the WNBA is in the process of trying to distinguish itself from the NBA. I remember hearing something when Charlotte's expansion team was announced that said the Sting would retain their name and not conform to fit their "big brother's" image. The Connecticut Sun is a step in that direction, although the San Antonio Silver Starzz or whatever the heck they are, is a Spurs knock-off. What would the Sting change it to anyways? I think Lynx is the only "female-ish" cat I can think of, and Minnesota has it already. Maybe the Roar?And to tack on to what I was saying earlier about it being the worst logo ever, I think it's just a combination of both unoriginality and blandness. The logo looks so uninteresting to me... no tonal shading at all. *shrug* If you wanna see a great Bobcats concept, go take a look at the University of Ohio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted January 19, 2004 Share Posted January 19, 2004 HUUUGE bump...On the Fanhome board, someone found a small b/w pic of the rejected Charlotte NBA logos...Rejected Charlotte NBA logosJust thought I could post this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMS1122 Posted January 19, 2004 Share Posted January 19, 2004 wow, they all arent spectacular...i'd like to see what they look like larger GMS on dribbbleErie Apparel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted January 19, 2004 Share Posted January 19, 2004 I know it may very well have been mainly a wordmark identified team name, but I'm intrigued by flight...they definatley could do more than a wordmark too. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampman Posted January 19, 2004 Share Posted January 19, 2004 While it is not exact--it is close enough to the logo of a woman's football team--the Tacoma Majestics of the Independant Womens Football League (or at least they were in that league last time I looked.) That logo is a mountain lion/cougar etc.If the NFL can sue a women's league for their name being close, can a woman's team sue the the Bobcats? Or does Al Davis need to be involved?Tacoma Majestics Comic Sans walks into a bar, and the bartender says, "Sorry, we don't serve your type here." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitroseed Posted January 19, 2004 Author Share Posted January 19, 2004 Hah! This is the first thread and post I ever made on these boards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted January 19, 2004 Share Posted January 19, 2004 Wow the FLight looks just like the Magic that would have been a bad concept. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.